Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: September 5573
Next month in: 00:18:22
Server time: 19:41:37, November 24, 2024 CET
Currently online (2): AR Drax | itsmenotme | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Education act 2795

Details

Submitted by[?]: Liberal Union

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: September 2796

Description[?]:

At current the nature of education is that it is entirely voluntary. Currently, as all schools are privately owned, this is liable to discrimination and inequality to those less able. This act is to ensure a compulsory rounded education for all citizens up to a certain age. However, We also feel that if a person wishes, they may be allowed to receive education at home, Where this is the case it must be stated to local authorities.

We also seek to nationalise all education, so as to ensure all people in education get the same treatment and therefore equal opportunities. Obviously, we recognise the need for competition so as to allow employers to differentiate between applicants and choose the best for their vacancy, and so we allow higher education to remain private and thus the education given will be varied, but the government is willing to fully subsidise all higher education. We believe that knowledge is a basic right, and should not be sold.

Other provisions are also given, regulating punishment in schools, and advising on matters regarding sexual education. We feel that an early and thorough understanding of sexual health and sexuality will allow individuals to make informed decisions with regards to sex and the law, and so help curtail the threat of STI's and pregnancies within individuals who would otherwise not be deemed mentally or physically ready for such an act.

We believe that such an act gives everyone an equal opportunity in life, and equips them with skills necessary for later life, and in work. We also believe it is beneficial for those citizens who later in life choose to move to other countries and require some form of qualification to obtain work.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date05:57:50, August 01, 2009 CET
FromDrasciian New Left
ToDebating the Education act 2795
MessageI'd prefer private schools to be legal in article 2.

Otherwise I fully support Articles 1, 3, 4 and 5

Date10:47:36, August 01, 2009 CET
FromSons of Liberty
ToDebating the Education act 2795
MessageIf you go to a government school, you learn that the government is always right.

No better way than compulsory education of the agenda of the state can turn generations of potentially great minds into the drivel of Statist henchmen supporting the force and evil of the state at every turn.

We will never agree to any initiation of force, especially on families and their decisions regarding their children's education, especially when the agenda behind it is one that will brainwash generation after generation to accept tyranny and oppression by a monolithic state.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
   

Total Seats: 0

no
 

Total Seats: 265

abstain
   

Total Seats: 0


Random fact: "OOC", "IC" and "IG" are commonly-used acronyms in Particracy. "OOC" refers to comments, discussions and actions which are out-of-character, meaning they are done player-to-player rather than party-to-party. "IC" refers to in-character interactions (ie. party-to-party). Similarly, "IG" means in-game, although this term may also simply refer to what happens in the actual game interface, as opposed to on the forum or elsewhere. "RP" just means "role-play".

Random quote: "We must face the fact that the preservation of individual freedom is incompatible with a full satisfaction of our views of distributive justice." - Friedrich August von Hayek

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 68