We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Industry Ownership
Details
Submitted by[?]: Solentian Global Justice Party
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: February 2130
Description[?]:
The state must own most industry. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Government policy on industry and subsidies to industrial operations.
Old value:: The government acts as an investor of last resort, by nationalizing failing industries that provide vital goods or services.
Current: The government does not intervene in the market nor provide any form of subsidies/relief to industries.
Proposed: The state owns the commanding heights of the economy and all major industries, but private ownership is allowed in the minor industries.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 14:57:06, October 22, 2005 CET | From | National Socialists | To | Debating the Industry Ownership |
Message | What are we all communists now? |
Date | 02:58:32, October 23, 2005 CET | From | Communist Fascist And Anarchial Party | To | Debating the Industry Ownership |
Message | according to your party name..... yes |
Date | 05:56:54, October 23, 2005 CET | From | Solentian Global Justice Party | To | Debating the Industry Ownership |
Message | hang on NS... read the bill properly. Think about it. Government regulates industry = poor benefit and every other person. Private ownership = poor get poorer and rich corporations get bigger. |
Date | 06:10:47, October 23, 2005 CET | From | Solentian Global Justice Party | To | Debating the Industry Ownership |
Message | hang on NS... read the bill properly. Think about it. Government regulates industry = poor benefit and every other person. Private ownership = poor get poorer and rich corporations get bigger. |
Date | 15:33:04, October 23, 2005 CET | From | National Socialists | To | Debating the Industry Ownership |
Message | Yes, but this topic should decide how failing industries should be saved. If we push the problem away by nationalizing everything we still can't secure the employment of the workers. We think the current measure is good, by nationalizing failing industries we can both save a piece of our economy and all the jobs of the workers. We believe the current policy is best of both worlds. |
Date | 09:18:44, October 24, 2005 CET | From | Communist Fascist And Anarchial Party | To | Debating the Industry Ownership |
Message | or we if nationalise them, they'll net get screwed up enough that we have to intervene....... |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | |||
yes |
Total Seats: 0 | |||
no |
Total Seats: 195 | |||
abstain |
Total Seats: 505 |
Random fact: The majority of nations in Particracy are "Culturally Protected" with an established cultural background. Only the "Culturally Open" nations are not bound by the rules surrounding culture. The Cultural Protocols Index should be consulted for more information about the cultural situation of each nation. |
Random quote: "One of the greatest delusions in the world is the hope that the evils in this world are to be cured by legislation." - Thomas B. Reed |