Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: October 5475
Next month in: 00:50:41
Server time: 07:09:18, April 27, 2024 CET
Currently online (1): Ost | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Space Exploration Reform Bill of 2797

Details

Submitted by[?]: People's Party - Republican Democrats

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: April 2798

Description[?]:

.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date09:12:16, August 06, 2009 CET
FromSocial Justice Party
ToDebating the Space Exploration Reform Bill of 2797
MessageWhile we agree with the PUSD that privatization of the space industry can be a good thing, we believe that government can and should act as a strong patron of science and technological development. We therefore cannot accept this bill on the grounds that it would fully eliminate the state-owned space agency.

Date13:17:22, August 06, 2009 CET
FromPeople's Party - Republican Democrats
ToDebating the Space Exploration Reform Bill of 2797
MessageThe state would still retain control of space exploration policy, inasmuch as permits are issued if and when a private space exploration company proves that their proposal is worthwhile researching. And there is nothing in this bill that forbids the state to continue as a patron of space exploration, should it be considered a worthwhile endeavour.
What this bill does, however, is reducing the drain on the coffers of the state that a fully-fledged space exploration agency and its bureaucratic underpinnings represent.

Date15:32:39, August 06, 2009 CET
FromSocial Justice Party
ToDebating the Space Exploration Reform Bill of 2797
MessageIt is not just control of a space program that the SJP is interested in, for control for its own sake is not justified, it is the active patronage of a space program and science in general. So, we are more interested in the following position:

The government shall operate a space agency that contracts with and oversees private space-exploration companies.

Nonetheless, we do see a point in the PUSD's mention of costs to government, and we would be willing to see an associated budget proposal outlining the amount of money saved by eliminating the public space program.

Date16:18:59, August 06, 2009 CET
FromPeople's Party - Republican Democrats
ToDebating the Space Exploration Reform Bill of 2797
MessageThere is no reason why private space exploration companies should not profit from the funds of the Ministry of Science and Technology, provided that such subsidisation of a space program is considered worthwhile and of enough practical value to justify spending the money.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
 

Total Seats: 192

no
   

Total Seats: 307

abstain

    Total Seats: 0


    Random fact: Make sure your nation casts its nominations in Particracy's very own Security Council elections! For more information, see http://forum.particracy.net/viewtopic.php?f=26&t=8453

    Random quote: "A single death is a tragedy; a million deaths is a statistic." - Josef Stalin

    This page was generated with PHP
    Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
    Queries performed: 50