We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Constitutional Change
Details
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This bill asks for an amendement to the Constitution. It will require two-thirds of the legislature to vote in favor. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: August 2130
Description[?]:
| A Change |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The title of the head of government, who chairs the cabinet.
Old value:: Community's Legate
Current:
| Segretario del Congresso Generale |
Proposed: Prime Minister
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change The formal title of the Head of State.
Old value:: People's Ambassador
Current: Segretario Generale
Proposed: President
Article 3
Proposal[?] to change The official title of the legislative assembly.
Old value:: People's Assembly
Current: Congresso Generale
Proposed: The Convention
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 13:33:50, October 22, 2005 CET | From | Tories | To | Debating the Constitutional Change |
| Message | I believe that as we the Imperialists and our allies have been consistently voted in, it is clear that a more Capitalist system is wanted. Therefore we still wish to have an elected head of state and government, but with more Capitalist Names. |
| Date | 15:56:20, October 22, 2005 CET | From | Tudeh Party of Quanzar | To | Debating the Constitutional Change |
| Message | You mean with more generic names? |
| Date | 16:22:51, October 22, 2005 CET | From | Tories | To | Debating the Constitutional Change |
| Message | If you wish to say that. Perhaps maybe I can change them to something more pleasing to you. However, I must say that People's Ambassador etc. no longer fit the role set out by the people. |
| Date | 01:52:00, October 23, 2005 CET | From | National Farmers' Party | To | Debating the Constitutional Change |
| Message | I'll vote for this bill, however, isn't the President head of state and the Prime minister head of the government and cabinet? |
| Date | 11:48:28, October 23, 2005 CET | From | Tories | To | Debating the Constitutional Change |
| Message | You are right and it has been changed. |
| Date | 02:04:05, October 24, 2005 CET | From | NeoSocialist Party | To | Debating the Constitutional Change |
| Message | It will not pass. If the voters want to give you the power to change constitution, they better work harder |
| Date | 11:21:49, October 24, 2005 CET | From | Tories | To | Debating the Constitutional Change |
| Message | Is there any change that would be accepted? Perhaps a Roman Republic style system? |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||
| yes |
Total Seats: 207 | |||
| no | Total Seats: 136 | |||
| abstain | Total Seats: 58 |
| Random fact: Use a valid e-mail address for your Particracy account. If the e-mail address you entered does not exist, your account may be suspected of multi-accounting and inactivated. |
| Random quote: "If Lincoln were alive today, he’d be turning over in his grave." - Gerald Ford |