Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: September 5475
Next month in: 03:10:55
Server time: 00:49:04, April 27, 2024 CET
Currently online (1): LC73DunMHP | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Bag of Goodies

Details

Submitted by[?]: Old School Liberal Party

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This bill asks for an amendement to the Constitution. It will require two-thirds of the legislature to vote in favor. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: November 2130

Description[?]:

Here, to counteract some actions of the Communists and Assholes, is an Old School bill that outlines what we would very much like.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date20:46:40, October 23, 2005 CET
FromSect of the Green Moon
ToDebating the Bag of Goodies
MessageI might change four back but the rest is good.

Date22:13:51, October 23, 2005 CET
From Grand National Party
ToDebating the Bag of Goodies
MessageIf Article 11 were to be removed, there would not be a 2/3 requirement.

Either way, I support.

Date01:57:46, October 24, 2005 CET
FromLibertarian and Federalist Alliance
ToDebating the Bag of Goodies
MessageWhy do we need to remove animal testing regulations? You favour cruelty to them?

Date02:02:52, October 24, 2005 CET
FromOld School Liberal Party
ToDebating the Bag of Goodies
MessageWe favor less regulation. How effective can restrictions on animal testing be if they are not actively and severely enforced? And exactly how much would it cost to actively and severely enforce them?

I can assure you that with the free press, there will be a lot of hollering if something substantially cruel is done to animals, and companies will self-regulate themselves to avoid losing money.

Date02:30:28, October 24, 2005 CET
FromLibertarian and Federalist Alliance
ToDebating the Bag of Goodies
MessageGood argument; you won me.

Date02:53:15, October 24, 2005 CET
FromThe Raging Bull Zealots of Zidine
ToDebating the Bag of Goodies
MessageYou called me a asshole!

Date02:55:30, October 24, 2005 CET
FromLibertarian and Federalist Alliance
ToDebating the Bag of Goodies
MessageActually you've called yourself an asshole! :-)

Change your name if you don't like it.

Date03:00:22, October 24, 2005 CET
FromThe Raging Bull Zealots of Zidine
ToDebating the Bag of Goodies
MessageNo I love it, which is why I changed to a fascist/totalitarian party.

Date03:05:09, October 24, 2005 CET
FromLibertarian and Federalist Alliance
ToDebating the Bag of Goodies
MessageOne feels that if Hitler had named the party the National Socialist Worker's Asshole Party, he may not have won...

Date03:08:10, October 24, 2005 CET
FromLibertarian and Federalist Alliance
ToDebating the Bag of Goodies
MessageAnd check your inbox, asshole...

Date03:19:30, October 24, 2005 CET
FromThe Raging Bull Zealots of Zidine
ToDebating the Bag of Goodies
MessageWell, you know how those Germans love Hasselhoff. If the Hoff had been around then, he could of won all by himself.

Date03:57:10, October 24, 2005 CET
FromLibertarian and Federalist Alliance
ToDebating the Bag of Goodies
MessageWhy the flip-flop? In your other bill, the advantage is to smaller regions, here it is to larger ones. Can't make up your honourable mind?

Date05:07:21, October 24, 2005 CET
FromOld School Liberal Party
ToDebating the Bag of Goodies
MessageFlip-flopping is when one actually switches sides in a two-option position. For example, if I decide I'm fully for legalization of marijuana, then decide later that I'm fully against it, I am flip-flopping.

However, if I astutely realize that no one wants to legalize marijuana completely today, but that they might be willing to make it a less criminal offense, I would COMPROMISE and propose a bill saying as much with hopes of getting it passed, taking important steps towards eventual legalization of marijuana.

Please don't be stupid. Just change your name to the Yellow Party or something less against your espoused ideology than "Libertarian."

Date07:13:15, October 24, 2005 CET
FromCommunist Party of Kafuristan
ToDebating the Bag of Goodies
MessageI must disagree with this proposal. My step brother was shot, and loosening gun control won't help anyone.

Date20:31:16, October 24, 2005 CET
FromLibertarian and Federalist Alliance
ToDebating the Bag of Goodies
MessageThere is, of course, no reason to get offensive OSLP, this is just a game afterall. And please remember that political parties don't always have to name themselves according to their ideology.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
    

Total Seats: 132

no
   

Total Seats: 168

abstain
 

Total Seats: 0


Random fact: Treaties will be eligible for deletion if they are more than 50 in-game years old and have no currently ratified members.

Random quote: First and second class seats on public transport shall be BANNED! We are all FIRST CLASS people, regardless of whether we are rich or poor and can afford or not afford to pay for a more expensive seat. From now on, all seats on trains, buses, trams, planes and so on shall be the SAME. We will all travel in the SAME way, TOGETHER. ~ Friedrich Pfeiffer General Secretary of the Dorvish Communist Party

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 151