Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: August 5575
Next month in: 02:57:03
Server time: 13:02:56, November 28, 2024 CET
Currently online (2): AethanSel | itsjustgav | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Cabinet Proposal of April 2830

Details

Submitted by[?]: Saridani Progressive Alliance

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This bill presents the formation of a cabinet. It requires more than half of the legislature to vote yes. Traditionally, parties in the proposal vote yes, others (the opposition) vote no. This bill will pass as soon as the required yes votes are in and all parties in the proposal have voted yes, or will be defeated if unsufficient votes are reached on the deadline.

Voting deadline: December 2830

Description[?]:

Proposing a Cabinet

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date03:20:28, October 10, 2009 CET
FromSaridani Progressive Alliance
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of April 2830
MessageOh hint hint people, this is kind of a joke/wake up call. Get a grip. We're gonna spend the entire term bitching about forming a cabinet and then probably the next one too. Sort it out, these cabinet wrangles consume far too much of our politics.

Date03:56:21, October 10, 2009 CET
FromNeo-Rational Populist Party
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of April 2830
MessageAgreed... a rational cabinet based on party strength as well as partnerships but not blatantly ignoring other parties is what we owe the people.Partisan bickering accomplishes nothing.

Date04:40:40, October 10, 2009 CET
FromParty One
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of April 2830
MessageUnfortunately that is how it is. The UDM gets vitriolic for every pretended offense and will not alter course. My party has offered numerous attempts to work with them and will continue to do so, all for nothing. Until there is a solid bloc sorted out that has a clear majority, this kind of chaos will continue.


Date05:49:11, October 10, 2009 CET
FromLibertarian Party
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of April 2830
MessageLast time i checked your were the one who voted against the last cabinet that could have been formed because you were the one who couldnt get a grip

Date06:48:17, October 10, 2009 CET
FromParty One
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of April 2830
MessageWhy would one vote for a cabinet they are excluded from?

Date17:22:42, October 10, 2009 CET
FromLibertarian Party
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of April 2830
Messagethat comment was for SCA. Besides thats a good question. Why are you voting for a cabinet right now your excluded from?

Date18:27:56, October 10, 2009 CET
FromSaridani Progressive Alliance
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of April 2830
MessageI actually voted for one specific cabinet one which someone else voted no on. We're at an impasse folks and I doubt another election will solve it.

Date19:50:15, October 10, 2009 CET
FromParty One
ToDebating the Cabinet Proposal of April 2830
Messagewe'll see. if the populace leanings shift, then its hard to say.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
  

Total Seats: 270

no
   

Total Seats: 311

abstain
 

Total Seats: 169


Random fact: Jelbic = "Group of cultures with an overall Central Asian/Eurasian steppe theme, using a fictional language developed specifically for Particracy".

Random quote: "Any law which violates the inalienable rights of man is essentially unjust and tyrannical; it is not a law at all." - Maximilien Robespierre

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 59