We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Corporal Punishment Act
Details
Submitted by[?]: Nationalist Conservative Party
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: August 2838
Description[?]:
The National Conservative Party makes no apology for their hardline approach to social cohesion. As pointed out in our liquour licence policy we want to stamp out anti social behaviour. Therefore in schools we want to give the right back to the teachers in disciplining our children. The current draconian feel good laws that are in place now serve no respect for the community. I urge like minded conservative parties and members who support SOCIAL COHESION in the Republic of Badara to vote YES!!!! |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The teacher's right to discipline children.
Old value:: Teachers are forbidden from striking children and may only use non-contact discipline (detention, expulsion etc).
Current: Teachers are forbidden from striking children and may only use non-contact discipline (detention, expulsion etc).
Proposed: Teachers may use corporal punishment at their discretion.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 13:58:35, October 25, 2009 CET | From | Hizb al-Ba'th al-Ma'atraniyyah al-Qawmi | To | Debating the Corporal Punishment Act |
Message | Although i agree with you, i dont think corporal punishment is the awnser to this problem. |
Date | 23:31:43, October 25, 2009 CET | From | Conservative Coalition Party | To | Debating the Corporal Punishment Act |
Message | At their discretion kind of bothers me as well. I have no problem with them using corperal punishment but rules have to be set up to make sure it doesn't turn to abuse. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | ||||
yes | Total Seats: 0 | ||||
no |
Total Seats: 246 | ||||
abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
Random fact: Players who consent to a particular role-play by acknowledging it in their own role-play cannot then disown it or withdraw their consent from it. For example, if player A role-plays the assassination of player B's character, and player B then acknowledges the assassination in a news post, but then backtracks and insists the assassination did not happen, then he will be required under the rules to accept the validity of the assassination role-play. |
Random quote: "The substance of the eminent Socialist gentlemen's speech is that making a profit is a sin. It is my belief that the real sin is taking a loss!" - Winston Churchill |