We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Food and Beverages Labelling Regulations Act (2131)
Details
Submitted by[?]: Labor Party
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: October 2132
Description[?]:
| To make sure that all Food and Beverages are labelled in a manner that can be easily seen and understood by consumers. All products shall state the type of ingrediants added, including warning of any artifical ingrediants. Alcohol products shall state, alcohol precentage. Dangerous Chemical shall have proper clear warnings. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Food and beverage labeling regulations.
Old value:: Companies are required to label food and beverage products somewhere on the package.
Current: Companies must clearly label food and beverage products, in a manner that can be easily understood.
Proposed: Companies must clearly label food and beverage products, in a manner that can be easily understood.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 04:14:17, October 27, 2005 CET | From |  Roman Imperialist Party | To | Debating the Food and Beverages Labelling Regulations Act (2131) |
| Message | Agreed. |
| Date | 16:12:57, October 27, 2005 CET | From | People's Democratic Party | To | Debating the Food and Beverages Labelling Regulations Act (2131) |
| Message | Will support. |
| Date | 02:27:36, October 28, 2005 CET | From | New Daio Party | To | Debating the Food and Beverages Labelling Regulations Act (2131) |
| Message | Needs definition. Elaborate, make points. |
| Date | 03:32:06, October 28, 2005 CET | From | Socialist Republic Party | To | Debating the Food and Beverages Labelling Regulations Act (2131) |
| Message | agreed |
| Date | 15:30:49, October 28, 2005 CET | From | New Daio Party | To | Debating the Food and Beverages Labelling Regulations Act (2131) |
| Message | Good in theory, but continues to lack proper definition. |
| Date | 01:26:03, October 29, 2005 CET | From | Anti-Particracy and Unionist Party | To | Debating the Food and Beverages Labelling Regulations Act (2131) |
| Message | We've already proposed this motion. Oh, well! |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 267 | |||||
| no |
Total Seats: 73 | |||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 61 |
| Random fact: In Culturally Protected nations, special care must be taken to ensure realism is maintained when role-playing a government controlled by an ethnic and/or religious minority. If it is to be supposed that this government is supported by a majority of the population, then this should be plausibly and sufficiently role-played. The burden of proof is on the player or players role-playing such a regime to demonstrate that it is being done realistically |
| Random quote: "The whole uncivilized bunch on the opposite benches can get stuffed." - Craig Warwick, former Dranian politician |