Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: December 5573
Next month in: 02:27:58
Server time: 05:32:01, November 25, 2024 CET
Currently online (0): Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Welfare Act

Details

Submitted by[?]: The Raging Bull Zealots of Zidine

Status[?]: passed

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: September 2132

Description[?]:

I, the Grand Imperial Overlord of Kafuristan dictates that we will NOT be commies!

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date00:41:37, October 28, 2005 CET
FromCommunist Party of Kafuristan
ToDebating the Welfare Act
MessageChild-benefit and a minimum income aren't commie...

Trust me, if it were our party's way, we would have 100% income tax, which is actually impossible in Particracy.

Date02:19:05, October 28, 2005 CET
FromLibertarian and Federalist Alliance
ToDebating the Welfare Act
MessageCan I remind the Traditional Party that they just voted FOR the current value of Article I here:
http://82.238.75.178:8085/particracy/main/viewbill.php?billid=26638
The same is true of other parties. Why now vote against it?


Date02:23:19, October 28, 2005 CET
FromLibertarian and Federalist Alliance
ToDebating the Welfare Act
MessageWith apologies to Maude Flanders: Won't somebody PLEASE think of the children?

Date03:07:46, October 28, 2005 CET
FromCommunist Party of Kafuristan
ToDebating the Welfare Act
MessageAfter this passes, I shall propose to undo this bill, and I can almost guarantee that it will pass again.

Date06:37:17, October 28, 2005 CET
FromOld School Liberal Party
ToDebating the Welfare Act
MessageYou know what would be nice? A non-extreme solution as far as welfare was concerned. We're only voting yes here because it's closer to our desires than what you've put out before.

Date20:49:15, October 28, 2005 CET
FromLibertarian and Federalist Alliance
ToDebating the Welfare Act
MessageI suggest introducing into the next Parliament a bill to give Child Support to poor families, not large families. Would this be less extreme, Old School Liberal Party?

Date14:47:00, October 31, 2005 CET
FromCommunist Party of Kafuristan
ToDebating the Welfare Act
MessageThe "Old School Liberal Party" says one thing and votes another. You would rather let people starve than feed more than those who need it?

Date15:50:15, October 31, 2005 CET
FromOld School Liberal Party
ToDebating the Welfare Act
MessageWe didn't say one thing and vote another. This bill was indeed preferable to the system that existed. Such ridiculous levels of welfare have no place in any society, especially in a society where the economy is so far behind the curve already. We weren't particularly ecstatic about this bill, but we were even less excited about your insane proposals to create obscenely high minimum wages and minimum incomes.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
     

Total Seats: 203

no
  

Total Seats: 65

abstain
 

Total Seats: 32


Random fact: The use of proxy servers makes it impossible to detect multiing and is therefore forbidden. Players who access Particracy through a proxy will have their accounts inactivated.

Random quote: "I swear to the Lord I still can't see Why Democracy means Everybody but me." - Langston Hughes, The Black Man Speaks

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 64