We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Chemical Defence Bill
Details
Submitted by[?]: Liberal Patriots' League
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: July 2133
Description[?]:
| Should other nations dare use chemical weapons upon us; we should have the capacity to change their mind. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy concerning biological and chemical weaponry.
Old value:: The nation shall never purchase, produce, or store biological or chemical weaponry, for military purposes. Research and development of the technology is permitted.
Current: The nation shall never develop, purchase or store biological or chemical weaponry.
Proposed: The nation reserves the right to develop, construct and store biological and chemical weapons.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 16:05:44, October 28, 2005 CET | From | Ecotopian Party of Kalistan | To | Debating the Chemical Defence Bill |
| Message | A whole hearted welcome to this proposal. |
| Date | 17:20:54, October 28, 2005 CET | From | Imperial Kalistan Party | To | Debating the Chemical Defence Bill |
| Message | Weak. |
| Date | 20:44:44, October 28, 2005 CET | From | Pansexual Peace Party -- FNORD | To | Debating the Chemical Defence Bill |
| Message | Incidently, we disagree with halting the reaserch on Chemical and Bioloical agents. |
| Date | 01:59:30, October 29, 2005 CET | From | Liberal Patriots' League | To | Debating the Chemical Defence Bill |
| Message | I seemed to have put up the wrong proposal. Try this one. |
| Date | 09:57:02, October 29, 2005 CET | From | Ecotopian Party of Kalistan | To | Debating the Chemical Defence Bill |
| Message | You put up the wrong proposal the second time around. Not a chance of us voting for this. |
| Date | 15:33:01, October 29, 2005 CET | From | Liberal Patriots' League | To | Debating the Chemical Defence Bill |
| Message | Yes; but you would see our enemies destroy us; but the LCP stands strong. |
| Date | 16:20:45, October 29, 2005 CET | From | Kalistani Workers Party | To | Debating the Chemical Defence Bill |
| Message | This coming from the same person who voted against the nuclear weapons bill. |
| Date | 20:07:35, October 29, 2005 CET | From | Farmers' Militia | To | Debating the Chemical Defence Bill |
| Message | Sometimes, you can't always rely on God to smite the heatens for you. I'm for this bill. |
| Date | 02:16:16, October 30, 2005 CET | From | Liberal Patriots' League | To | Debating the Chemical Defence Bill |
| Message | I didn't vote for free use of nuclear weapons. I did introduce the nuclear rearmement bill, if you remember. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 126 | |||||
| no | Total Seats: 35 | |||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 52 |
| Random fact: Use a valid e-mail address for your Particracy account. If the e-mail address you entered does not exist, your account may be suspected of multi-accounting and inactivated. |
| Random quote: "Were it not for electricity, we would have to watch television in the dark." - Muammar Gaddafi- |