Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: August 5475
Next month in: 01:34:02
Server time: 22:25:57, April 26, 2024 CET
Currently online (3): hexaus18 | Nileowen_Kir | TaMan443 | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: History Tradition

Details

Submitted by[?]: Partiya Nacionalnogo Progressa

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This bill asks for an amendement to the Constitution. It will require two-thirds of the legislature to vote in favor. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: December 2044

Description[?]:

When Telamon was 5 separate countries,they were equal. Let's return this time.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date13:02:56, April 29, 2005 CET
From
ToDebating the History Tradition
MessageDo you mean what the proposal says this time? I remember the PNP proposing this before, then changing the proposal to the current system.

Date13:05:21, April 29, 2005 CET
FromPartiya Nacionalnogo Progressa
ToDebating the History Tradition
Messagehttp://aiglesrv.no-ip.info:8080/particracy/main/viewbill.php?billid=988

It helped progress, and now it is time to return good old time.

Date13:05:37, April 29, 2005 CET
FromPartiya Nacionalnogo Progressa
ToDebating the History Tradition
MessageIt was UCA proposition.

Date13:07:45, April 29, 2005 CET
From
ToDebating the History Tradition
MessageOK, it was UCA last time. But you progressivists voted yes, so you are still voting against yourself whatever you do.

Date13:11:10, April 29, 2005 CET
FromPartiya Nacionalnogo Progressa
ToDebating the History Tradition
MessageAny problem in this? It was many years ago...

Date13:13:55, April 29, 2005 CET
From
ToDebating the History Tradition
MessageIt is your problem if it is any. I was just stating a fact. The point of saying that was to make everyone think about the previous bill on this issue.

Date13:15:50, April 29, 2005 CET
FromPartiya Nacionalnogo Progressa
ToDebating the History Tradition
MessageOur party have flexible position.

Date17:34:37, April 29, 2005 CET
FromUnited Liberal Alliance
ToDebating the History Tradition
MessageYes, the last bill changing the electoral system was proposed by us. We this proposal was made by mistake and then it was changed to the current system which we believe works well enough and therefore don't believe that there is any need to change it. This is after all a one chamber Parliament and so population and size of region should matter in electoral representation (whereas if we had 2 chambers, the upper chamber would have this system)

Date17:51:20, April 29, 2005 CET
From
ToDebating the History Tradition
MessageThe SDC cannot support something that moves us further from a one man one vote system. While individual regions have their own distinct traits and cultures we are still one country. We are all Telamonese (?)

Date18:38:14, April 29, 2005 CET
FromConservative Party of Telamon
ToDebating the History Tradition
MessageConsidering the amount, of Province Population, is not extremly high.

Like comparing New York to say Alabama.

There should be equal representation.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
   

Total Seats: 54

no
  

Total Seats: 31

abstain

    Total Seats: 0


    Random fact: Head to the "Language assistance" thread to receive and offer help with translations: http://forum.particracy.net/viewtopic.php?f=5&t=6368

    Random quote: "Public schools are government-established, politician- and bureaucrat-controlled, fully politicized, taxpayer-supported, authoritarian socialist institutions. In fact, the public-school system is one of the purest examples of socialism existing in America." - Thomas L. Johnson

    This page was generated with PHP
    Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
    Queries performed: 71