Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: August 5475
Next month in: 03:27:28
Server time: 20:32:31, April 26, 2024 CET
Currently online (4): burgerboys | hexaus18 | hexaus19 | ZulanALD | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Welfare State (extreme)

Details

Submitted by[?]: Slaytanic Wehrmacht

Status[?]: passed

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: November 2133

Description[?]:

http://82.238.75.178:8085/particracy/main/viewbill.php?billid=27296

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date05:22:02, October 31, 2005 CET
FromCooperative Commonwealth Federation
ToDebating the Welfare State (extreme)
MessageUniversal social programmes aren't all that extreme.

Date06:46:44, October 31, 2005 CET
FromSlaytanic Wehrmacht
ToDebating the Welfare State (extreme)
MessageWell i don't know why you didn't like the more moderate option then.

Date17:01:18, October 31, 2005 CET
FromCooperative Commonwealth Federation
ToDebating the Welfare State (extreme)
MessageJust didn't like paying for big families.

Date17:26:46, October 31, 2005 CET
FromSlaytanic Wehrmacht
ToDebating the Welfare State (extreme)
Message"all families" includes "big families"

Date01:00:15, November 01, 2005 CET
FromCooperative Commonwealth Federation
ToDebating the Welfare State (extreme)
MessageBenefit for all families is fine. Or for small families, fine. Paying a benefit only to big families is an incentive to have more kids, so it's the worst option. Maybe we just read the proposals differently, i dunno.

Date13:02:55, November 01, 2005 CET
FromSlaytanic Wehrmacht
ToDebating the Welfare State (extreme)
MessageI proposed to provide welfare to poor and big families. That only left out small and rich families. You opposed it. Now that i include welfare for the rich, everyone supported it ??

Date13:13:19, November 01, 2005 CET
From Tuesday Is Coming
ToDebating the Welfare State (extreme)
MessageFunny that I dont, considering that I require party members to be rich.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
     

Total Seats: 136

no
  

Total Seats: 112

abstain
 

Total Seats: 52


Random fact: If you want to leave Particracy, please inactivate yourself on your user page to save the moderation team some time.

Random quote: "And what is Aleppo?" - Gary Johnson

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 58