We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Corpus Act
Details
Submitted by[?]: United Socialist Front
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: October 2135
Description[?]:
| The human body is a work of art, and we are all born with it. Repression of this often leads to extreme wanting or hating of the human body, whereas it being a constant or frequent presence makes it more than acceptable, if even noticeable. If most people don't like nudity, then most people may continue wearing clothes. This does not endanger people, nor causes suffering, and so should be legal. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy on public nudity.
Old value:: Public nudity laws are left to local governments.
Current: Public nudity is illegal, but private nudist colonies and beaches are permitted.
Proposed: There are no laws with regards to public nudity, it is allowed.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 03:40:13, October 30, 2005 CET | From | Aldurian Libertarian Socialist Party | To | Debating the Corpus Act |
| Message | We agree with the USF. |
| Date | 08:12:21, October 30, 2005 CET | From | New Aldurian Conservative Party | To | Debating the Corpus Act |
| Message | We believe that this should be left to local governments, not taken over by the national government. We therefore oppose this encroachment of big government. |
| Date | 22:16:31, October 30, 2005 CET | From | Aldurian Libertarian Socialist Party | To | Debating the Corpus Act |
| Message | Big governement ? This bill protect a negative right of the individual ... |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 123 | ||||
| no | Total Seats: 0 | ||||
| abstain |
Total Seats: 278 |
| Random fact: Players have a responsibility to differentiate between OOC (out-of-character) and IC (in-character) behaviour, and to make clear when they are communicating in OOC or IC terms. Since Particracy is a role-playing game, IC excesses are generally fine, but OOC attacks are not. However, players must not presume this convention permits them to harass a player with IC remarks that have a clear OOC context. |
| Random quote: "If democracy is ever to be threatened, it will not be by revolutionary groups burning government offices and occupying the broadcasting and newspaper offices of the world. It will come from disenchantment, cynicism and despair caused by the realization that the New World Order means we are all to be managed and not represented." - Tony Benn |