Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: July 5475
Next month in: 02:40:22
Server time: 17:19:37, April 26, 2024 CET
Currently online (1): HopesFor | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Militarism Bill

Details

Submitted by[?]: Conservative Party

Status[?]: passed

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: April 2871

Description[?]:

We must have strong armed forces to protect the revolution.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date12:45:48, December 28, 2009 CET
FromFree Socialist Reform Party
ToDebating the Militarism Bill
MessageI agree to most aspects of this bill. However, Article 9 is downright discrimination, and it will hinder, not improve, our army. I would also suggest that Article 6 should include exceptions for the morally restricted etc.

Date12:46:58, December 28, 2009 CET
FromFree Socialist Reform Party
ToDebating the Militarism Bill
MessageThis bill shall be opposed by us.

Date18:58:20, December 28, 2009 CET
FromPeople's Liberal Action Party
ToDebating the Militarism Bill
MessageMr. Speaker,
I am uncomfortable with this bill as it will place our country on high alert to other nations. Our nation should be a peaceful one, not militaristic. I yield
- Abram Green

Date21:23:55, December 28, 2009 CET
FromConservative Party
ToDebating the Militarism Bill
MessageMr Speaker,
Why on earth would you want women in the front line? How on earth would it hinder our army to remove a rediculously small proportion of our front line soldiers from that position and not have to deal with all the nonsense involved in having a handful of women in that position. Furthermore the revolution can only be secured by a strong military.
- Samara Yacobs

Date22:12:12, December 29, 2009 CET
FromKonservative Partei Malivia
ToDebating the Militarism Bill
Message´This a step to a fasicst and totalerian state!

Date21:44:54, December 30, 2009 CET
FromConservative Party
ToDebating the Militarism Bill
MessageCommunist, darling.

Date22:13:02, December 30, 2009 CET
FromKonservative Partei Malivia
ToDebating the Militarism Bill
MessageThe voters will destoy communism wih us!

Date22:13:49, December 30, 2009 CET
FromConservative Party
ToDebating the Militarism Bill
MessageThe voters gave us a majority?

Date22:16:11, December 30, 2009 CET
FromKonservative Partei Malivia
ToDebating the Militarism Bill
MessageWell, there will be a election in the future......

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
 

Total Seats: 56

no
  

Total Seats: 44

abstain
 

Total Seats: 0


Random fact: Particracy allows you to establish an unelected head of state like a monarch or a president-for-life, but doing this is a bit of a process. First elect a candidate with the name "." to the Head of State position. Then change your law on the "Structure of the executive branch" to "The head of state is hereditary and symbolic; the head of government chairs the cabinet" and change the "formal title of the head of state" to how you want the new head of state's title and name to appear (eg. King Percy XVI).

Random quote: "Changing the way we measure things is vital. So is decompartmentalising society making sure that economics and politics are not divorced from other crucial areas of life." - David Attenborough

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 110