Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: September 5475
Next month in: 03:02:12
Server time: 00:57:47, April 27, 2024 CET
Currently online (4): dnobb | ImperialLodamun | LC73DunMHP | Moderation | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Step One in Acting for our Conscience

Details

Submitted by[?]: Committee for Liberation

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: September 2873

Description[?]:

The first step in conscience protection.

Those who hold religious objection to war may apply for conscientious objector status and serve a term as a medic or other non-combatant position; or in a civilian position not related to the production of arms.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date17:39:13, January 03, 2010 CET
FromCommittee for Liberation
ToDebating the Step One in Acting for our Conscience
MessageMr Speaker,

We hope this is acceptable to protect conscience rights.

I yield.

Date09:32:08, January 04, 2010 CET
FromLiberal Alliance
ToDebating the Step One in Acting for our Conscience
MessageMr Speaker,

I ask you; what IS conscience?

This will only make our defence weaker and our nations strength lesser.

Against.

Date14:48:11, January 04, 2010 CET
FromConstitutionalist Imperial League (IA)
ToDebating the Step One in Acting for our Conscience
MessageMr Speaker,

In light of the CfL's treasonous proposal, we oppose this bill.

I yield.

Date02:42:26, January 05, 2010 CET
FromCommittee for Liberation
ToDebating the Step One in Acting for our Conscience
MessageMr Speaker,

Evidence that the imperialists can not be trusted at their word.

I yield.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
  

Total Seats: 61

no
  

Total Seats: 139

abstain
 

Total Seats: 0


Random fact: Large scale RP planning (such as wars, regional/continental conflicts, economic collapse, etc.) should be planned (as best as it can be) and should have consent of a majority of players involved.

Random quote: “Can anyone imagine a more perverse idea than forcing faithful Hosians like me to give away my money to enable irresponsible teenage girls to kill off their children because they were too drunk to use a damn condom?" - Dr. Francesca dos Santos, former Dranian politician

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 55