Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: October 5475
Next month in: 02:16:34
Server time: 05:43:25, April 27, 2024 CET
Currently online (0): Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Ratification of the Recongnition of the Republic of New Englia

Details

Submitted by[?]: United Democrats

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This bill proposes for the ratification of a treaty. It will require two-thirds of the legislature to vote in favor[?]. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: October 2881

Description[?]:

This bill asks for the ratification of the Recongnition of the Republic of New Englia. If this treaty is ratified, it becomes binding and will define national law.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date22:02:12, January 18, 2010 CET
FromLatter-Day Saints Party
ToDebating the Ratification of the Recongnition of the Republic of New Englia
MessageOOC: If this happened a few months ago, I would have agreed to ratification, but the recent amendment to the pax cynica makes the whole concept of New Englia illegal because it is under the control of a single player.

Date22:05:46, January 18, 2010 CET
FromRutanian Elitist Party
ToDebating the Ratification of the Recongnition of the Republic of New Englia
MessageOOC: Indeed.

Date08:14:06, January 19, 2010 CET
FromPeople's Union for Upturn and Openness
ToDebating the Ratification of the Recongnition of the Republic of New Englia
MessageWe will use our recently acquired 0 seats to vote against this ratification, and urge parties with more seats to do the same.

Date17:27:53, January 19, 2010 CET
FromThe Liberal Party
ToDebating the Ratification of the Recongnition of the Republic of New Englia
MessageOOC: Gentlemen, if I may, New Englia is not considered illegal at all. If I am not mistaken, which I don't think I am in this case, it was agreed to by the players in Kirlawa to allow one player to administer the day to day activities of the protectorate because he was/is the most active in Kirlawa. However, all the decisions are still made by their legislature. I recommend you ask the players in Kirlawa directly. Hope that helps!

Date19:35:38, January 19, 2010 CET
FromLatter-Day Saints Party
ToDebating the Ratification of the Recongnition of the Republic of New Englia
MessageOOC: In order for New Englia to be legal, all decisions regarding that land need to be made by the legislature of Kirlawa. Since Afrocentric has done things completely on his own without a mandate from the legislature, then New Englia is most certainly illegal.

Date20:50:38, January 19, 2010 CET
FromUrban Party of Kirlawa
ToDebating the Ratification of the Recongnition of the Republic of New Englia
MessageNew Englia is no longer a protectorate of Kirlawa and functions as its own country and therefor is not subject to any laws of Kirlawa. I agreed to take over the activities of New Englia when it was granted its independence and this should not be seen as a violations of the rules.

Date00:08:08, January 20, 2010 CET
FromLatter-Day Saints Party
ToDebating the Ratification of the Recongnition of the Republic of New Englia
MessageOOC: The rules specifically state that "no colony can be owned or administered by an individual player, party or party organisation." That makes New Englia illegal.

Date03:32:16, January 20, 2010 CET
FromUrban Party of Kirlawa
ToDebating the Ratification of the Recongnition of the Republic of New Englia
MessageOOC: New Englia is country not a colony and has been that way for almost 100 years.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
 

Total Seats: 59

no
     

Total Seats: 441

abstain
 

Total Seats: 0


Random fact: "Nation raiding" or a malevolent coordinated effort by a single user or group of users to interrupt the gameplay, significantly alter the culture or direction of a nation is strictly prohibited. Players interacting in nation raiding will be sanctioned.

Random quote: "The man who prefers his country before any other duty shows the same spirit as the man who surrenders every right to the state. They both deny that right is superior to authority." - John Dalberg-Acton

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 64