We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Smoking in Places of Employment Act, 2134
Details
Submitted by[?]: Radical Greens
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: September 2136
Description[?]:
A ban on smoking in places of employment to help protect the heatlth of the citizens. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Government policy towards smoking.
Old value:: Smoking is legal everywhere, at the discretion of the property owner, but is illegal in government-owned buildings.
Current: Smoking is legal outdoors and in private homes and clubs, but illegal indoors in places of employment, with the exception of places that primarily serve liquor.
Proposed: Smoking is legal outdoors and in private homes and clubs, but illegal indoors in all places of employment.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 23:42:28, October 31, 2005 CET | From | Unio enim si quis Motus Populi | To | Debating the Smoking in Places of Employment Act, 2134 |
Message | nope. If I want to light up in my own office, I will do so, unless of course the owner doesn't want me to. |
Date | 00:34:23, November 01, 2005 CET | From | Radical Greens | To | Debating the Smoking in Places of Employment Act, 2134 |
Message | yes but if by your smoking that you harm other people is that good. |
Date | 00:53:04, November 01, 2005 CET | From | Unio enim si quis Motus Populi | To | Debating the Smoking in Places of Employment Act, 2134 |
Message | And by being nude in public, I could give some easily startled old lady a heart attack. Yet, we've recently allowed public nudity. |
Date | 03:52:32, November 01, 2005 CET | From | Radical Greens | To | Debating the Smoking in Places of Employment Act, 2134 |
Message | Smoking in public would still be legal, just in places of employment where workers can find it hard to escape from it. |
Date | 07:23:29, November 01, 2005 CET | From | Unio enim si quis Motus Populi | To | Debating the Smoking in Places of Employment Act, 2134 |
Message | so they can work within the laws, and if they own the building, or they can request of the owner, not to allow smoking in the building. |
Date | 17:52:13, November 01, 2005 CET | From | Party of Evil | To | Debating the Smoking in Places of Employment Act, 2134 |
Message | Smoking should be allowed everywhere, and for everyone. The government should not be allowed to tell people how to run their lives. |
Date | 21:48:48, November 01, 2005 CET | From | Radical Greens | To | Debating the Smoking in Places of Employment Act, 2134 |
Message | This leglislation is here to protect citizens of the Kundrati Union, why can't people just walk outside to smoke in a place of employment as its your choice to smoke and not other peoples. "The government should not be allowed to tell people how to run their lives." We should have no regulation on waste disposal then and let people dump it where ever suits them, with no thoughts to how this will affect other people now or in the long term. Leglislation like this is needed for protection of people and does not append on civil rights. |
Date | 16:16:54, November 02, 2005 CET | From | Party of Evil | To | Debating the Smoking in Places of Employment Act, 2134 |
Message | Now that you mention it, the waste disposal laws are far too tight. Liberty to the people! :D |
Date | 10:43:51, November 03, 2005 CET | From | Radical Greens | To | Debating the Smoking in Places of Employment Act, 2134 |
Message | If we let anybody do anything then the country would be a massive waste dump and land would be worthless. Animal and plant populations would find it hard to exist when many are been killed for a quick dollar which also affects the national ecological system. Sometimes a look forward needs to be taken to prevent such disasters. |
Date | 19:59:16, November 04, 2005 CET | From | Party of Evil | To | Debating the Smoking in Places of Employment Act, 2134 |
Message | Seriously, I don't think we'll support this. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | |||||
yes | Total Seats: 117 | |||||
no |
Total Seats: 188 | |||||
abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
Random fact: Submitting a bill without any proposals in it will not attract or detract voters. It will not raise your visibility or change your political position. |
Random quote: "Those looking for ideology in the White House should consider this: for the men who rule our world, rules are for other people." - Naomi Klein |