We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: ERB 2
Details
Submitted by[?]: Mouvement d'Étoile Rouge
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: June 2138
Description[?]:
Ecology Reform Bill 2 |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Government policy regarding a national park system.
Old value:: The government devolves park policy to local governments.
Current: The government funds and maintains a network of national parks and/or marine protected areas.
Proposed: The government funds and maintains a network of national parks and/or marine protected areas.
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change Waste disposal responsibility.
Old value:: It is the responsibility of local governments to decide on waste disposal regulation.
Current: The government is responsible for waste disposal.
Proposed: The government is responsible for waste disposal.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 17:58:54, November 02, 2005 CET | From | Action Française | To | Debating the ERB 2 |
Message | We could possibly support this. |
Date | 21:35:59, November 02, 2005 CET | From | Mouvement d'Étoile Rouge | To | Debating the ERB 2 |
Message | They both make sense environmentally. You cannot vote to harm the environment. |
Date | 10:24:47, November 04, 2005 CET | From | Action Française | To | Debating the ERB 2 |
Message | But all you are doing is transferring it from local to national government. And we shall vote yes anyway. |
Date | 20:18:42, November 04, 2005 CET | From | Malfico Progressive Fascist Party | To | Debating the ERB 2 |
Message | We shall oppose this bill. We support leaving as many decisions as possible to those with an understanding of local needs and desires. |
Date | 01:06:27, November 06, 2005 CET | From | Kanjoran Imperial Party | To | Debating the ERB 2 |
Message | we oppose, to. The local government needs the most power. If everyone wants national parks so bad, the someone will make a private one. So, instead of paying taxes to go to the park, you'll pay a fee. |
Date | 12:59:26, November 09, 2005 CET | From | Action Française | To | Debating the ERB 2 |
Message | That is outragous, the inner city poor need access to green spaces, you can't charge them for it. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | ||||||
yes |
Total Seats: 348 | ||||||
no | Total Seats: 251 | ||||||
abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
Random fact: The people in your nation don't like inactive parties. When you often abstain from voting for a bill, they will dislike your party and your visibility to the electorate will decrease significantly. Low visibility will means you are likely to lose seats. So keep in mind: voting Yes or No is always better than Abstaining. |
Random quote: "We never know the worth of water 'til the well is dry." - Thomas Fuller |