We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Cabinet Proposal of February 2901
Details
Submitted by[?]: Falanges Party
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This bill presents the formation of a cabinet. It requires more than half of the legislature to vote yes. Traditionally, parties in the proposal vote yes, others (the opposition) vote no. This bill will pass as soon as the required yes votes are in and all parties in the proposal have voted yes, or will be defeated if unsufficient votes are reached on the deadline.
Voting deadline: October 2901
Description[?]:
| Proposing a Cabinet |
Proposals
Article 1
The responsibilites of Head of Government will be conducted by the Falanges Party
Article 2
The responsibilites of Science and Technology will be conducted by the Alliance of Social Democrats
Article 3
The responsibilites of Food and Agriculture will be conducted by the Constitutionalist Imperial League (IA)
Article 4
The responsibilites of Environment and Tourism will be conducted by the Constitutionalist Imperial League (IA)
Article 5
The responsibilites of Trade and Industry will be conducted by the Falanges Party
Article 6
The responsibilites of Foreign Affairs will be conducted by the Constitutionalist Imperial League (IA)
Article 7
The responsibilites of Internal Affairs will be conducted by the Falanges Party
Article 8
The responsibilites of Finance will be conducted by the Falanges Party
Article 9
The responsibilites of Defence will be conducted by the Constitutionalist Imperial League (IA)
Article 10
The responsibilites of Justice will be conducted by the Alliance of Social Democrats
Article 11
The responsibilites of Infrastructure and Transport will be conducted by the Falanges Party
Article 12
The responsibilites of Health and Social Services will be conducted by the Constitutionalist Imperial League (IA)
Article 13
The responsibilites of Education and Culture will be conducted by the Falanges Party
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 20:41:46, February 28, 2010 CET | From | Falanges Party | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of February 2901 |
| Message | A more coherent cabinet |
| Date | 00:08:21, March 01, 2010 CET | From | Heaven on Terra (IA) | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of February 2901 |
| Message | The HoT is very dissapointed that we will not be able to represent the people that voted for us in the last election in any way. Though a new party we believe we have a lot to offer, therefore we will not support this Bill. We are going to call for an early election soon and we will then be able to voice ourselves in a more powerful way. |
| Date | 00:35:28, March 01, 2010 CET | From | Liberal Alliance | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of February 2901 |
| Message | We thanks for the confidence the Fundamentalists have shown in us. |
| Date | 16:45:57, March 01, 2010 CET | From | Constitutionalist Imperial League (IA) | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of February 2901 |
| Message | Mr Speaker, The CIL cannot support this cabinet proposal. There are severeal reasons for our opposition. Firstly, we believe the majority it would yield is far too small and that its members would be subject to fierce retribution from other parties were they to lose the majority. Thus we believe this cabinet to be quite risky. In addition, we cannot support a government that excludes our good allies the EAP and HoT. We are open to negotiations on the rotation of both some cabinet positions and privy council positions, but we cannot and will not abandon our allies in this way. I yield. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 43 | |||||
| no |
Total Seats: 141 | |||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 16 |
| Random fact: If your "Bills under debate" section is cluttered up with old bills created by inactive parties, report them for deletion on the Bill Clearouts Requests thread: http://forum.particracy.net/viewtopic.php?f=11&t=4363 |
| Random quote: "Capitalism and communism stand at opposite poles. Their essential difference is this: the communist, seeing the rich man and his fine home, says: 'No man should have so much.' The capitalist, seeing the same thing, says: 'All men should have as much.'" - Phelps Adams |