We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Civil Rights
Details
Submitted by[?]: King's Hope Party (ACN)
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: May 2911
Description[?]:
| Less Strict |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy towards daily working hours.
Old value:: The government obligates trade unions and employers to negotiate the daily number of working hours.
Current: Daily working hours are regulated by the government.
Proposed: The government has no policy concerning daily working hours.
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change Pharmaceutical drugs policy.
Old value:: The government pays for all citizens' pharmaceutical drugs.
Current: The government supplies free pharmaceutical drugs to those on low incomes.
Proposed: The government subsidises the cost of pharmaceutical drugs for people on low incomes.
Article 3
Proposal[?] to change Displays of public affection and obscenity laws.
Old value:: Sexual intercourse is illegal in public.
Current: Sexual intercourse is illegal in public.
Proposed: There are no laws regarding obscene public acts.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 14:16:44, March 20, 2010 CET | From |  ƒortenohƒiv (ACN) | To | Debating the Civil Rights |
| Message | Only Article 3 is passable by my means... Nay. |
| Date | 16:48:20, March 20, 2010 CET | From | Humanist Alliance | To | Debating the Civil Rights |
| Message | Forte, it looks like you don't have a severe illness- |
| Date | 16:51:23, March 20, 2010 CET | From | Humanist Alliance | To | Debating the Civil Rights |
| Message | Article 3 has nothing to do with civil rights. In fact almost nothing of this. |
| Date | 20:30:40, March 20, 2010 CET | From | King's Hope Party (ACN) | To | Debating the Civil Rights |
| Message | OCC: I know some of them don't but it says I am restrictive leaning in Civil Rights!!! You all know I am the most write-winged person on the planet!!! How in God's name am I restrictive leaning??? ~Hope~ |
| Date | 23:09:32, March 20, 2010 CET | From | Humanist Alliance | To | Debating the Civil Rights |
| Message | Write-winged |
| Date | 23:39:02, March 20, 2010 CET | From | Humanist Alliance | To | Debating the Civil Rights |
| Message | So people can f*** in the streets, your boss can f**** you but if you have an illness, you die or you go into bankrupcy. Bravo Endralion! |
| Date | 23:34:34, March 23, 2010 CET | From | King's Hope Party (ACN) | To | Debating the Civil Rights |
| Message | Well. I already put the socialist agenda in here a little to try to make it fair for you. I let low income families be subsidised. Besides, the government is not inovative. That is why Free Health Care ruins a nation, no one is inovative in the health indrustry because the government is running it and they can not make a profit! ~Hope~ |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 207 | |||||
| no |
Total Seats: 94 | |||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
| Random fact: For more information on Particracy's former colonial nations, check out http://forum.particracy.net/viewtopic.php?f=5&t=6640 |
| Random quote: "The issues are much too important for the Chilean voters to be left to decide for themselves." - Henry Kissinger |