Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: August 5474
Next month in: 02:48:33
Server time: 21:11:26, April 24, 2024 CET
Currently online (5): dnobb | hyraemous | jebjab | JWDL | Ost | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Free Industry

Details

Submitted by[?]: Anarcho-Capitalist Front

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: February 2137

Description[?]:

.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date18:36:28, November 04, 2005 CET
FromPeople's Progressive Party
ToDebating the Free Industry
MessageWe respectfully disagree with all articles in the proposition. Article 1 is further continuing an already existing problem. National defense must be truly national, and that means that defense industries should not be private. However, since they are, we should subsidize them in order to have the power to focus them on projects deemed in the national interest. Article 2 is completely unfair to the health and safety of our citizens. Government is not an intermediary it is the guarantor of opportunity and fair competition, and allowing corporations to maximize profits at the risk of consumers' health and worker's safety is by no means guaranteeing opportunity or a fair playing field. Article 3 is also disagreeable because it allows this government to abandon our societies hard working poor and that is just plain wrong. This will increase the size of the poor and eliminate much opportunity for class mobility.

We are willing to support Article 1 if the spending that is cut through its passage goes to support currently existing social programs. However, only if Articles 2 and 3 are taken off the bill.

Date03:35:53, November 05, 2005 CET
FromNational Fascisti
ToDebating the Free Industry
MessageWe disagree with all.

Date16:36:47, November 05, 2005 CET
FromAnarcho-Capitalist Front
ToDebating the Free Industry
MessageIf the public is to maintain check on the government, it must possess the defense industry. If the defense industry is privately owned, there must be no subsidies given.

The workers and consumers are perfectly able to protect their own wellbeing. Let them call for safe workplaces as they see necessary instead of letting government lobbyists and bureaucrats decide for them.

Minimum wage does nothing to insure mobility, if anything it stagnates the economy by artificially setting a price for unskilled labor.

Date19:31:38, November 05, 2005 CET
FromPeople's Progressive Party
ToDebating the Free Industry
MessageAnd what exactly would make the companies respond to workers and consumers calls for safety and health if not regulation? Nothing. These policies may seem fiscally "responsible" but only in as much as they are socially irresponsible. Privatizing defense puts it in the hands of the few profiteers not the public.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
 

Total Seats: 96

no
      

Total Seats: 303

abstain
 

Total Seats: 0


Random fact: Real-life religions should not be referenced in Particracy. Terra has its own religions, many of which mirror real-life ones. See: http://particracy.wikia.com/wiki/Illustrated_Catalogue_of_Religion

Random quote: "It depends upon what the meaning of the word 'is' is." - Bill Clinton

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 65