Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: September 5573
Next month in: 00:27:56
Server time: 19:32:03, November 24, 2024 CET
Currently online (1): AR Drax | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Citizen Equality Bill

Details

Submitted by[?]: People's Union for Upturn and Openness

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This bill asks for an amendement to the Constitution. It will require two-thirds of the legislature to vote in favor. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: December 2921

Description[?]:

In the current political system, a vote of a citizen from Khodor is considered to be more important than those from other regions. The PUUO demands that this inequality is abolished as soon as possible.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date17:31:11, April 09, 2010 CET
From Alliance for a New Rutania
ToDebating the Citizen Equality Bill
MessageYou state that the vote from a citizen from Khodor is considered more important than those of other regions.
How is this even possible as the current system gives equal representation to all regions.

Under your proposed system you would disrupt the regional equality of representation by giving advantage to Bozarland and Delvar, the two most populous regions. Then Khodor and Kragusrov would be left as the lesser represented regions as they are the two least populous regions.

Date15:48:33, April 10, 2010 CET
From People's Union for Upturn and Openness
ToDebating the Citizen Equality Bill
MessageKhodor has a lot less inhabitants than other regions, but the same amount of seats in the Parliament. Therefore, you don't have to be a mathematical genius to see that a vote in Khodor has more weight than a vote in another region.

Date17:15:03, April 10, 2010 CET
From Rutanian Elitist Party
ToDebating the Citizen Equality Bill
MessageWe agree with the ANR. Under the current system of commonwealths we strive to offer equal representation to all regions. This is the purpose of our extremely decentralized system, in which many decisions are made at the local level. On the federal level we make decisions regarding all the regions. For this reason each region should be represented equally. We oppose this piece of legislation.

Date11:40:08, April 11, 2010 CET
From People's Union for Upturn and Openness
ToDebating the Citizen Equality Bill
MessageHow can you speak of equality if a seat in 1 region represents less voters than in another region?

Date14:25:00, April 11, 2010 CET
From Rutanian Elitist Party
ToDebating the Citizen Equality Bill
MessageWell there are several types of equality e.g. simple individual-based equality, bloc-equality etc. Equality among the regions means in fact bloc-equality, i.e. equality is realized among different groups and not within them. This types is perfectly legitimate in the same way as the definition understood by the PUUO.

Date08:51:48, April 12, 2010 CET
From People's Union for Upturn and Openness
ToDebating the Citizen Equality Bill
MessageSo if we would make a new region with let's say 1,000 inhabitants and give them 200 seats as well, that would be the REP definition of equality?

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
  

Total Seats: 297

no
  

Total Seats: 203

abstain

    Total Seats: 0


    Random fact: The Real-Life Equivalents Index is a valuable resource for finding out the in-game equivalents of real-life cultures, languages, religions, people and places: http://forum.particracy.net/viewtopic.php?f=11&t=6731

    Random quote: "The test of courage comes when we are in the minority. The test of tolerance comes when we are in the majority." - Ralph W. Sockman

    This page was generated with PHP
    Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
    Queries performed: 57