Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: November 5573
Next month in: 00:10:09
Server time: 03:49:50, November 25, 2024 CET
Currently online (2): itsjustgav | wstodden2 | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: On Smoking

Details

Submitted by[?]: Alliance 44

Status[?]: passed

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: February 2137

Description[?]:

Time to understand zero tolerance leads us to nowhere.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date17:22:28, November 05, 2005 CET
FromLiberal Democratic Party
ToDebating the On Smoking
MessageEven your proposed change is a bit too restrictive

Date17:58:02, November 05, 2005 CET
FromAlliance 44
ToDebating the On Smoking
Messageallowing indoor smoking in places of employment would hurt the right of non-smokers to health

Date18:00:10, November 05, 2005 CET
FromJesters & Jugglers Party
ToDebating the On Smoking
Messagewhat if a non-smokers is standing with you waiting for the bus ?
that's outdoor and it would hurt the non-smokers health
and in a private home it could hurt the health of your wife and kids
and pets

Date18:15:33, November 05, 2005 CET
FromAlliance 44
ToDebating the On Smoking
Messagepets? is this meant to be 'common sense'? let me please laugh out loud at the objections of my honourable friend!

Date18:37:57, November 05, 2005 CET
FromJesters & Jugglers Party
ToDebating the On Smoking
Messageit's common sense not to kill a pet that you paid a lot for :p

Date18:50:41, November 05, 2005 CET
FromSociety of Sadists
ToDebating the On Smoking
Message"Let's give children lung cancer especially the working class ones!" Labour manifesto?

Date11:42:31, November 06, 2005 CET
FromAlliance 44
ToDebating the On Smoking
MessageNonsense. You are suggesting that 1) if allowed people will smoke in front of their children 2) every smoker has a kid or more 3) the 'working classes' smoke more than anyone else 4) any kid (or pet, lol) being present when a smoker smoked his/her cigarette wiil get lung cancer. The whole argument is very hypocritical, biased and false. Let the government not poke their noses into the private lives of the individual.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
    

Total Seats: 55

no
   

Total Seats: 42

abstain
  

Total Seats: 3


Random fact: Unless otherwise stated, monarchs and their royal houses will be presumed to be owned by the player who introduced the bill appointing them to their position.

Random quote: "It's not enough that we do our best; sometimes we have to do what's required." - Winston Churchill

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 63