We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: On Smoking
Details
Submitted by[?]: Alliance 44
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: February 2137
Description[?]:
Time to understand zero tolerance leads us to nowhere. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change Government policy towards smoking.
Old value:: Smoking is prohibited.
Current: Smoking is legal outdoors and in private homes and clubs, but illegal indoors in all places of employment.
Proposed: Smoking is legal outdoors and in private homes and clubs, but illegal indoors in all places of employment.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 17:22:28, November 05, 2005 CET | From | Liberal Democratic Party | To | Debating the On Smoking |
Message | Even your proposed change is a bit too restrictive |
Date | 17:58:02, November 05, 2005 CET | From | Alliance 44 | To | Debating the On Smoking |
Message | allowing indoor smoking in places of employment would hurt the right of non-smokers to health |
Date | 18:00:10, November 05, 2005 CET | From | Jesters & Jugglers Party | To | Debating the On Smoking |
Message | what if a non-smokers is standing with you waiting for the bus ? that's outdoor and it would hurt the non-smokers health and in a private home it could hurt the health of your wife and kids and pets |
Date | 18:15:33, November 05, 2005 CET | From | Alliance 44 | To | Debating the On Smoking |
Message | pets? is this meant to be 'common sense'? let me please laugh out loud at the objections of my honourable friend! |
Date | 18:37:57, November 05, 2005 CET | From | Jesters & Jugglers Party | To | Debating the On Smoking |
Message | it's common sense not to kill a pet that you paid a lot for :p |
Date | 18:50:41, November 05, 2005 CET | From | Society of Sadists | To | Debating the On Smoking |
Message | "Let's give children lung cancer especially the working class ones!" Labour manifesto? |
Date | 11:42:31, November 06, 2005 CET | From | Alliance 44 | To | Debating the On Smoking |
Message | Nonsense. You are suggesting that 1) if allowed people will smoke in front of their children 2) every smoker has a kid or more 3) the 'working classes' smoke more than anyone else 4) any kid (or pet, lol) being present when a smoker smoked his/her cigarette wiil get lung cancer. The whole argument is very hypocritical, biased and false. Let the government not poke their noses into the private lives of the individual. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | ||||
yes | Total Seats: 55 | ||||
no |
Total Seats: 42 | ||||
abstain | Total Seats: 3 |
Random fact: Unless otherwise stated, monarchs and their royal houses will be presumed to be owned by the player who introduced the bill appointing them to their position. |
Random quote: "It's not enough that we do our best; sometimes we have to do what's required." - Winston Churchill |