We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Establishment of Advanced Military
Details
Submitted by[?]: Conservative Republic Independent Party
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: January 2046
Description[?]:
| Bill to enact legislation of a Centralized Military Structure upon enactment. The Military is headed by the Supreme leader of the land who is chosen by the majority of voters. The leader of the Military is in charge of maintiaining peace and protecting our country from foriegn invaders. This Supreme leader of the land and Military is further in charge of maintaining and organizing the Navy and Air Force in times of war to protect our country at all costs and keep our soverignty as desired by the citizens. A strictly land-based national defense for our land shall be organized by the police forces under a centralized agency known as the Army in times of war. The Army is primarily used for homeland based operations during times of war and maintains the borders in times of possible invasion as war has been declared by a foreign ruler or the supreme leader of the land. The Army is headed by the Congress made up of all parties that have a representation of 20 seats or more. The Army communicates with the Navy and Air Force but has no control over them and the Navy and Air Force has no control over the Army. During peacetime the Army is inactive military known as the Police, meanwhile the Air Force and Navy are constantly on watch as a full time military operations corps. The Navy has land based soldiers that are only capable of performing operations overseas unless authorized by a the political paries that are in control of the Army in times of war only. The Navy's land based foreign operations unit shall be recognized as the Marines. Marines are at the control of the supreme leader of the country at all times unless the heads of the Army allow them to help for homeland defense, when the Marines would be at the control of the Army's leaders. This bill enacts a homeland defense known as the Army in times of war (as deemed by the supreme leader of the country), at the discretion of the Political Parties. It also enacts the Marines unit which is only under the discretion of the Supreme leader unless they are used for homeland based operations in time of war only. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The policy with respect to nuclear weaponry.
Old value:: The nation shall never develop, produce or store nuclear weaponry.
Current: The nation shall never develop, produce or store nuclear weaponry.
Proposed: The nation reserves the right to develop, produce and store nuclear arms.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 10:58:38, May 01, 2005 CET | From | Conservative Republic Independent Party | To | Debating the Establishment of Advanced Military |
| Message | The bill here is strongly reccommended as it contains necessary language to protect our sovereign nation in times of peace and war. Please support this bill. |
| Date | 16:25:13, May 01, 2005 CET | From | Social Democrat Party | To | Debating the Establishment of Advanced Military |
| Message | I will not support this. Nuclear weapons as a deterrent are not morally acceptable for me. |
| Date | 16:31:22, May 01, 2005 CET | From | National Democratic Party | To | Debating the Establishment of Advanced Military |
| Message | I would agree...although I am worried about what will happen when the warfare feature comes online (whenever that is LOL) |
| Date | 16:32:02, May 01, 2005 CET | From | National Democratic Party | To | Debating the Establishment of Advanced Military |
| Message | To clarify...I meant I would agree with the SDP that Nuclear weapons are not morally acceptable. |
| Date | 16:34:03, May 01, 2005 CET | From | Conservative Republic Independent Party | To | Debating the Establishment of Advanced Military |
| Message | I removed the Nuclear weapons proposal so we can get this important bill passed ASAP. |
| Date | 16:35:40, May 01, 2005 CET | From | Conservative Republic Independent Party | To | Debating the Establishment of Advanced Military |
| Message | Sorry about that, I do not know what happend. |
| Date | 16:36:42, May 01, 2005 CET | From | Conservative Republic Independent Party | To | Debating the Establishment of Advanced Military |
| Message | The bill is still good though and we shall ratify it ASAP for any other future proposals. |
| Date | 17:45:04, May 01, 2005 CET | From | People's Progressive Party | To | Debating the Establishment of Advanced Military |
| Message | I think nuclear weapons is an option best reconsidered after the next election. I will currently vote no in order to be consistant with my previous position, as long as the nuclear weapons proposal is attached. |
| Date | 17:57:51, May 01, 2005 CET | From | National Democratic Party | To | Debating the Establishment of Advanced Military |
| Message | Yes I shall vote no also. |
| Date | 14:54:36, May 02, 2005 CET | From | Benevolent Totalitarian Party - FLF | To | Debating the Establishment of Advanced Military |
| Message | I voted against the banning of nuclear weapons and I would be glad to see them re-introduced. The ability to turn enemy cities into plate glass should not be underestimated. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||
| yes | Total Seats: 32 | |||
| no | Total Seats: 27 | |||
| abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
| Random fact: Particracy does not allow real-life brand names (eg. Coca Cola, McDonalds, Microsoft). However, in the case of military equipment brand names it is permitted to use simple number-letter combinations (eg. T-90 and F-22) borrowed from real life, and also simple generic names, like those of animals (eg. Leopard and Jaguar). |
| Random quote: "Let's not forget that we belong to history, that history that men and women who fought before did, that history that men and women who are fighting now will do." - Tera Pisthis, former Selucian politician |