Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: September 5573
Next month in: 00:56:58
Server time: 19:03:01, November 24, 2024 CET
Currently online (2): ImperialLodamun | Mindus | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Mujaheddin Demands Revised

Details

Submitted by[?]: People's Mujaheddin

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This bill asks for an amendement to the Constitution. It will require two-thirds of the legislature to vote in favor. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: April 2932

Description[?]:

Following back to back election failures, the People's Mujaheddin has seen drastic changes in its leadership. Young,open-minded, and largely secular students, raised during civil wars and foreign power intervention have come to prominence within the ranks of the Mujaheddin. As such, Jalal Al-Ahmad el-Hussein, former leader of the Mujaheddin and known conservative cleric has been removed from his position and replaced by Ali Muhammad Shariati.

As such, from this point forth the Mujaheddin seeks the creation of a secular socialist state, free from imperialists and capitalists, free from backwards and sexist religious teachings, and free from tyranny! Let the government become transparent and run by all, for all.

The following are our proposals.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date07:36:50, May 01, 2010 CET
From Progressive Islamist League
ToDebating the Mujaheddin Demands Revised
MessageOOC: better separate bills that contains constitutional amendments(the term length bill) because it needs 2/3 vote to pass

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
  

Total Seats: 60

no
    

Total Seats: 191

abstain
  

Total Seats: 49


Random fact: Players have a responsibility to differentiate between OOC (out-of-character) and IC (in-character) behaviour, and to make clear when they are communicating in OOC or IC terms. Since Particracy is a role-playing game, IC excesses are generally fine, but OOC attacks are not. However, players must not presume this convention permits them to harass a player with IC remarks that have a clear OOC context.

Random quote: "With this faith we will be able to work together, to pray together, to struggle together, to go to jail together, to stand up for freedom together, knowing that we will be free one day." - Martin Luther King Jr.

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 54