Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: October 5573
Next month in: 03:41:36
Server time: 20:18:23, November 24, 2024 CET
Currently online (1): AR Drax | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Free Family Planning Act 2933

Details

Submitted by[?]: Progressive Centrist Democrats

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: January 2934

Description[?]:

The government should not interfere with birth control. The growth of the population is not the governments business. Parents should make a free decision without state influence.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date14:49:59, May 04, 2010 CET
FromAnarcho-Primitivist Concern
ToDebating the Free Family Planning Act 2933
MessageI can see no reason for this policy change. Government support for big families does not necessarily mean a limitation on people's freedom. We're just making it possible for poorer people to have large families if they wish it. That's not to say people have to do that.

Date14:58:36, May 04, 2010 CET
FromDark Templar (LL)
ToDebating the Free Family Planning Act 2933
Messagewhy? it's not like the government does not hook Ikradonian women to "rape" machines and let them make us glorious babies, I see no reason to change this policy

Date17:01:17, May 04, 2010 CET
FromProgressive Centrist Democrats
ToDebating the Free Family Planning Act 2933
MessageOf course you don't force anyone. But it is not the government's job. Just like in many other examples in this country.

Date19:32:48, May 04, 2010 CET
FromAnarcho-Primitivist Concern
ToDebating the Free Family Planning Act 2933
MessageIt's not the government's job to provide funding to support people establishing their families? I can't see why not. It is also the government's job to encourage people to act in ways that support this society, we're not forcing people to have big families, it can't be wrong for a state to promote behaviour which is good for the state.

Date21:05:13, May 04, 2010 CET
FromProgressive Centrist Democrats
ToDebating the Free Family Planning Act 2933
MessageIt is not the government's job to promote any behaviour. It is the government's job to protect people from harm. Besides that, we do agree that we should support people in whatever they want. People have to take responsibility for their actions. After all, we are not a socialist party. So we don't expect you to understand our principles.

Date21:13:39, May 04, 2010 CET
FromUnion Socialism Alliance
ToDebating the Free Family Planning Act 2933
MessageNobody is being forced. The fact is, that a bigger family means more Ikradons to work for Ikradon. We don't punish of force people to creat big families, we just promote the creation of big family. The choice is still theirs.

Through my entire term as Minister of Health & Social Services, I never once seaw a reason to change this policy of population growth promotion and as current Minister of Education & Culture, I still don't see a reason.

In fact, as former minister in charge of the Department of Health & Social Services, I had the pleasure of personally witnessing many happy large poor families being happy, with governmental financial and social support.

And today as the Minister in charge of the Department of Education & Culture, I can clearly see the fruits of this law, as many children from poor large families now have the chance of going, and excelling at school!

I think that I, and Union Socialism Alliance, has made it clear that we will be voting no on this bill.

Minister Nagila Muller,
Department of Education & Culture.

Date23:30:17, May 04, 2010 CET
FromProgressive Centrist Democrats
ToDebating the Free Family Planning Act 2933
MessageWe thought there are no poor people in socialist countries anyway.

Date05:30:37, May 05, 2010 CET
FromUnion Socialism Alliance
ToDebating the Free Family Planning Act 2933
MessageIn a socialist republic, in an ideal situation, everyone is about even financially. Before the current United Ikradon Coaliton in 2924, the country was politically unstable, with 6 elections in 6 years. It was not until 2924 that stability returned to Ikradon, and that the socialist republic has been in transformation ever since then. You as well as I could have imagined what chaos this instability created for the lesser wealthy of the socialist republic. This is why such a law was and is seen as benificial to the socialist republic.

Minister Nagila Muller
Department of Education & Culture



Date08:48:22, May 05, 2010 CET
FromProgressive Centrist Democrats
ToDebating the Free Family Planning Act 2933
MessageWe have no objections towards state help for the poor and needing. But we still disagree, that population growth should be encouraged.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
  

Total Seats: 258

no
   

Total Seats: 341

abstain
  

Total Seats: 0


Random fact: Information about the population of each country can be found on the Population Information thread: http://forum.particracy.net/viewtopic.php?f=5&t=8663

Random quote: "Patriotism is in political life what faith is in religion." - John Dalberg-Acton

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 65