We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Nuclear Weapons
Details
Submitted by[?]: Medusoid Party
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: June 2138
Description[?]:
| Willing to meet anyone opposed half-way |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy concerning the use of nuclear weaponry in warfare.
Old value:: The nation reserves the right to use nuclear weapons in warfare for any reason.
Current: The nation reserves the right to use nuclear weapons on non-civilian areas.
Proposed: The nation shall never use nuclear weapons in warfare.
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change The policy with respect to nuclear weaponry.
Old value:: The nation reserves the right to develop, produce and store nuclear arms.
Current: The nation reserves the right to develop, produce and store nuclear arms.
Proposed: The nation shall never develop, produce or store nuclear weaponry.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 23:43:25, November 08, 2005 CET | From |  Union of Progressive Ulama | To | Debating the Nuclear Weapons |
| Message | We want to vote yes, but aren't nuclear weapons the only thing protecting us from the insane warmongers in Deltaria? How about: no use of nuclear weapons unless another uses them first? And maybe a maximum number of warheads, enough to hit the major Deltarian targets if need be? |
| Date | 13:58:58, November 09, 2005 CET | From | Freedom Coalition | To | Debating the Nuclear Weapons |
| Message | We, like the UPU, would be happier with the middle value, we maintain nuclear weapons but shall not use them unless another nation uses them on us. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||||
| yes | Total Seats: 145 | ||||
| no |
Total Seats: 478 | ||||
| abstain |
Total Seats: 127 |
| Random fact: "Game mechanics comes first." For example, if a currently-enforced bill sets out one law, then a player cannot claim the government has set out a contradictory law. |
| Random quote: "It is obvious that the laissez-faire ideology represents the interests of big business. For decades, the right-wing has opposed welfare programs and nationalised companies, in favour of big business disguised under 'economic liberty'." - Cecilia Xu, former Gaduri politician |