Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: September 5575
Next month in: 02:38:31
Server time: 17:21:28, November 28, 2024 CET
Currently online (3): AR Drax | L905 | Mrfactsril | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Eminent Domain Prevention Act

Details

Submitted by[?]: Conservative-Libertarian Party (UM)

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: May 2937

Description[?]:

This Act prevents the government from forcibly taking private property.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date15:30:17, May 11, 2010 CET
From Labour Party
ToDebating the Eminent Domain Prevention Act
MessageMr Speaker, We Oppose very Strongly. We do not suggest the government ought to, however the option must be there in a state of emergency. If the cabinet offices are bombed in a state of war for example, the option needs to be available.

Date15:38:01, May 11, 2010 CET
From Conservative-Libertarian Party (UM)
ToDebating the Eminent Domain Prevention Act
MessageMr Speaker, I don't understand the point being made by the honourable gentleman. In the event of bombing, the Cabinet could locate elsewhere quite easily without depriving an individual of their private property. Furthermore, would it be absurd to suggest that the government has the resources to build its own property?

Date23:33:08, May 11, 2010 CET
From Hutorian Conservative Party
ToDebating the Eminent Domain Prevention Act
MessageMr Speaker, whilst the Labour Party have given us probably the worst example in the world, we too oppose the Act. The government should be able to seize private property if needs be. We do not believe the government should seize every piece of land within the nation but it should have a deterrant that allows us - in extreme circumstances - to do whats neccessary.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
  

Total Seats: 155

no
  

Total Seats: 228

abstain
  

Total Seats: 8


Random fact: Real life-life nationalities, cultures or ethnicities should not be referenced in Particracy (eg. "German").

Random quote: "Men's natures are alike, it is their habits that carry them far apart." - Confucius

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 54