We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Reverse the Burkha
Details
Submitted by[?]: People's Democratic Party
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: June 2939
Description[?]:
... |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The state's policy concerning religious clothing.
Old value:: Wearing religious clothing or religious symbols in public is illegal.
Current: There are no laws regulating the wearing of religious clothing and the wearing of religious symbols.
Proposed: There are no laws regulating the wearing of religious clothing and the wearing of religious symbols.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 15:04:37, May 15, 2010 CET | From | People's Democratic Party | To | Debating the Reverse the Burkha |
Message | MPK I'm going to save both our times. We know you will vote no to protect Muslim women's rights even though this protects them what you did takes them away. And I will vote yes saying your argument makes zero sense and is an abomination. There you go I just summed up our whole debate in a couple of sentences. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | ||
yes | Total Seats: 55 | ||
no | Total Seats: 0 | ||
abstain | Total Seats: 44 |
Random fact: The players in a nation have a collective responsibility to ensure their "Bills under debate" section is kept in good order. Bills which are irrelevant or have become irrelevant should be deleted. Deletion can be requested for bills proposed by inactive parties on the Bill Clearout Requests thread: http://forum.particracy.net/viewtopic.php?f=11&t=4363 |
Random quote: “Human rights means doing whatever the fuck you want” - Benji Benandez, former Dranian politician |