We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Common Carriage Regulation Act
Details
Submitted by[?]: Democratic Progressive Alliance (IA)
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: August 2942
Description[?]:
| We believe that public networks, such as telephone lines, constitute as common carriers and should thus be expected to provide basic, reliable services to the public. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy concerning phone services.
Old value:: There are no regulations on phone service.
Current: The state subsidizes the phone service of low income families, and regulates the rates providers can charge for phone service.
Proposed: The state subsidizes the phone service of low income families, and regulates the rates providers can charge for phone service.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 17:52:22, May 21, 2010 CET | From | Constitutionalist Imperial League (IA) | To | Debating the Common Carriage Regulation Act |
| Message | Mr Speaker, We oppose. I yield. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||
| yes | Total Seats: 59 | |||
| no |
Total Seats: 112 | |||
| abstain | Total Seats: 30 |
| Random fact: The people in your nation don't like inactive parties. When you often abstain from voting for a bill, they will dislike your party and your visibility to the electorate will decrease significantly. Low visibility will means you are likely to lose seats. So keep in mind: voting Yes or No is always better than Abstaining. |
| Random quote: "I don't believe you need to be bitch to succeed in business" - Lucinda Redwood, former Luthorian-Dorvish businesswoman |