Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: October 5573
Next month in: 02:53:05
Server time: 21:06:54, November 24, 2024 CET
Currently online (0): Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Valruzian Economic Renewal Act (VERA)

Details

Submitted by[?]: Independence Party

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: April 2942

Description[?]:

On Article 1:

How can large banks run by bureaucrats be more efficient than banks that are allowed to compete with each other, thereby bringing in financial innovations that, in the end, help the middle class? Yes, a mechanism should be in place to control monetary policy (a central bank) and we should have guarantees for victims of failed banks, but having the government actually run and operate the bank is inefficient and opens the door to corruption.

On Article 2:

Again, competition increases the quantity of output and lowers the price. Sure, provide subsidies for the poor. We would save a lot of money by de-nationalizing and allowing market mechanisms to work -the price of energy would go down, the supply would go up, and the common people would benefit.

On Article 3:

A flow of foreign capital into our country decreases the cost of living for our citizens and increases general wealth. Having such a contrived process for approving foreign investment is insane.

On Article 4:

Subsidies are counterproductive and usually end up helping big businesses at the expense of small businesses. Government ownership of industry is about the most inefficient thing imaginable and opens the door to huge corruption.

On Article 5:

There is no reason to own the stock exchanges. Nor is there a right to.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date11:37:11, May 21, 2010 CET
FromSocial Liberal Party
ToDebating the Valruzian Economic Renewal Act (VERA)
MessageArticle 2 and 5 are sticking points for the Social Liberal Party. For one, it's hard to have competition in the energy sector as the barriers to entry are so high. We also feel that there may be rare circumstances where government intervention in the economy could be needed in terms of relief.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
  

Total Seats: 67

no
  

Total Seats: 154

abstain
  

Total Seats: 154


Random fact: Particracy allows you to establish an unelected head of state like a monarch or a president-for-life, but doing this is a bit of a process. First elect a candidate with the name "." to the Head of State position. Then change your law on the "Structure of the executive branch" to "The head of state is hereditary and symbolic; the head of government chairs the cabinet" and change the "formal title of the head of state" to how you want the new head of state's title and name to appear (eg. King Percy XVI).

Random quote: "The decadent international but individualistic capitalism in the hands of which we found ourselves after the war is not a success. It is not intelligent. It is not beautiful. It is not just. It is not virtuous. And it doesn't deliver the goods." - John Maynard Keynes

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 62