We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: International Relations Act
Details
Submitted by[?]: Labour Party
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: August 2942
Description[?]:
... |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change
The government's policy regarding foreign embassies.
Old value:: Foreign countries may establish an embassy after obtaining approval from the Foreign Office.
Current: Foreign countries may establish an embassy after obtaining approval from the Foreign Office.
Proposed: Any other country may establish an embassy on national soil.
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change Travel by nationals to foreign nations
Old value:: The nation issues passports to nationals after a cursory security check.
Current: The nation issues passports to nationals after a cursory security check.
Proposed: The nation issues passports on demand for any reason to its nationals
Article 3
Proposal[?] to change Government policy towards giving aid to foreign countries.
Old value:: The government only gives aid for disaster relief in foreign countries.
Current: The government gives moderate aid to countries in need.
Proposed: The government gives moderate aid to countries in need.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 22:17:55, May 21, 2010 CET | From | Fortunato's Fascist Formation | To | Debating the International Relations Act |
Message | All three of these proposals are absurd, absurd and absurd. They are further proof that the Labour Party continues to neglect our growing immigration problem. Further proof that both parties disregard national security. |
Date | 22:28:25, May 21, 2010 CET | From | Fortunato's Fascist Formation | To | Debating the International Relations Act |
Message | Mr Speaker, let us think logically. This bill simply cannot pass. Article 1, would see our country be depleted of it's resources with no guaranteed return. Article 2, would see our country subjected to covert operations, spy rings and what not. Article 3, would impose a great risk on national security as our immigration system is a complete shambles with citizenship and nationality being granted on the grounds of simply passing a test. If this proposal passes, we may aswell despose of passports altogether and let anyone in. |
Date | 23:23:41, May 21, 2010 CET | From | Labour Party | To | Debating the International Relations Act |
Message | Mr Speaker, the FFF need to understand how they have gone wrong in their logic. The first proposal is granted, a modern policy for a modern, wealthy hutori. Some of our international brothers and sisters need help, and deserve it. We cannot stand by and watch people starve unnafected, we have a moral duty to the international community, just as the international community showed us compassion in our neediest times. Furthermore, an embassy is not allowed to carry covert operations, the gentlemen is fear mongering! An embassy is simply a reprisentative of a nation, and all nations ought to be allowed to reprisent themselves on our soil. Furthermore, the third one has absolutely nothing to do with immigration, because it is about giving a passport to our own citizens! Mr Speaker, I would ask you to beseech the gentleman to read the articles before emptily raging about them. |
Date | 04:51:00, May 22, 2010 CET | From | Fortunato's Fascist Formation | To | Debating the International Relations Act |
Message | Mr Speaker, we believe that the people, the state of Hutori must come before the rest of the world. It is our duty as Nationalists to make our people great. It is our duty as Fascists to make this nation, great. Once our position amongst the world elite has been finalised and cemented, only then can we concern ourselves with the rest. The Labour Party must realise that their socialist policies are a joke, their dreams of a modern, wealthy Hutori will only be realised, should they disband and dissapear. Not only that but their policies will rarely pass parliament, their 'dinner party' policies will never be acted out, unless they do the right thing and abandon their allies, the Conservative-Libertarian party. Their coalition has proven a disaster. I also congratulate the man before me for offering a one paragraph arguement rather than the random outbursts that we have become used to. |
Date | 10:05:19, May 22, 2010 CET | From | Labour Party | To | Debating the International Relations Act |
Message | Mr Speaker, I ask the gentleman, under what premise does he value this nation above other? How can he value human life in one part of earth more than the same human life abroad? |
Date | 10:29:55, May 22, 2010 CET | From | Fortunato's Fascist Formation | To | Debating the International Relations Act |
Message | Mr Speaker, we love our country and we love our people. It is as simple as that, therefore we believe that the people, the state of Hutori must come before the rest of the world. We wish to protect and preserve our culture, our traditions and most importantly our race. We are not equal, we are supreme! |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | ||
yes |
Total Seats: 81 | ||
no | Total Seats: 175 | ||
abstain | Total Seats: 135 |
Random fact: Players consent to the reasonable and predictable consequences of the role-play they consent to. For example, players who role-play their characters as committing criminal offences should expect those characters to experience the predictable judicial consequences of that. |
Random quote: "Democracy is the theory that the common people know what they want and deserve to get it good and hard." - H. L. Mencken |