We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Internet Service Nationalisation Bill of 2946
Details
Submitted by[?]: Hutorian Conservative Party
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: August 2947
Description[?]:
| ........ |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy on internet service providers (ISPs).
Old value:: Private companies provide internet service throughout the nation, without government interference.
Current: Private companies provide internet service throughout the nation, without government interference.
Proposed: The government controls and provides internet service throughout the nation. Private ISPs are banned.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 11:52:48, May 31, 2010 CET | From | Hutorian Conservative Party | To | Debating the Internet Service Nationalisation Bill of 2946 |
| Message | Rt Hon Sarah Marelle MP, NSC Frontbencher, Madam Speaker, this is another Nationalisation reform that the NSC encourage. We feel that having a government run ISP is much simpler and more efficient than having numerous private ones. This Act goes with our belief on nationalisation of large areas of Hutorian industry and business. As Labour are not fully committing to all forms of nationalisation, we ask the honorable gentleman will he support this Bill? |
| Date | 13:34:26, May 31, 2010 CET | From | Labour Party | To | Debating the Internet Service Nationalisation Bill of 2946 |
| Message | Madam Speaker, we are not, this specifically states that the government controls the internet it provides! We cannot controll the minds of our people! We Oppose. |
| Date | 13:39:40, May 31, 2010 CET | From | Hutorian Conservative Party | To | Debating the Internet Service Nationalisation Bill of 2946 |
| Message | Rt Hon Sarah Marelle MP, NSC Frontbencher, Madam Speaker, perhaps the gentleman can tell us where in this Act it states about controlling people's minds? Because it certainly doesnt say it in this Act. All the word control references is that the government controls the supply of internet - not whats actually on it! Perhaps the gentleman can acknowledge this and tell us why he really opposes this Act! |
| Date | 14:00:15, May 31, 2010 CET | From | Hutorian Conservative Party | To | Debating the Internet Service Nationalisation Bill of 2946 |
| Message | Madam Speaker, is that the sweet sound of silence from the Labour benches when asked a serious political question? Seems they are incapable of providing Parliament with an actual answer to a question! |
| Date | 14:25:26, May 31, 2010 CET | From | Labour Party | To | Debating the Internet Service Nationalisation Bill of 2946 |
| Message | Madam Speaker, The HNP (we do not regard a difference in your party) need to allow people to answer, this parliament is not owned by them! The act is not clear enough that the state will not control the content, because it does not make it clear where the control will be, as such we will not support this bill! It may be the HNP attempting to look like lambs in wolves clothing, as they often do. We oppose! |
| Date | 14:30:43, May 31, 2010 CET | From | Hutorian Conservative Party | To | Debating the Internet Service Nationalisation Bill of 2946 |
| Message | Madam Speaker, yet MORE question dodging from Labour. Answer the question from our previous arguement, "perhaps the gentleman can tell us where in this Act it states about controlling people's minds? Because it certainly doesnt say it in this Act. All the word control references is that the government controls the supply of internet - not whats actually on it! Perhaps the gentleman can acknowledge this and tell us why he really opposes this Act!" Answer the question, or you have shown yourselves as a weak, spineless party who refuse to be accountable to Parliament. |
| Date | 14:41:32, May 31, 2010 CET | From | Labour Party | To | Debating the Internet Service Nationalisation Bill of 2946 |
| Message | Madam Speaker, the HNP have not aknowleged our previous answer at all, we stated that "The act is not clear enough that the state will not control the content, because it does not make it clear where the control will be" |
| Date | 14:55:47, May 31, 2010 CET | From | Hutorian Conservative Party | To | Debating the Internet Service Nationalisation Bill of 2946 |
| Message | Madam Speaker, we thank Labour for proving our point. Thank you, you have shown yourselves to be true parliamentary cowards, unable to answer the simplest of questions. Truly thank you. The Act in question introduces no regulations on internet content! Labour seem to think we are controlling internet conent - which is a complete nonsense. They have made a simple error of misreading the proposal and are so stubborn they refuse to acknowledge this and are now so committed to this cherade they are unable to back out of it. Madam Speaker, at least Labour have proven the NSC's point. We sincerly thank them for that. |
| Date | 20:14:29, June 01, 2010 CET | From | Hutorian Conservative Party | To | Debating the Internet Service Nationalisation Bill of 2946 |
| Message | Still no answer from Labour then Madam Speaker, seems they are what we think they are. They obviously are unable to take the slighest piece of critisism? Perhaps they would answer the question put to them? It was Labour who said ,"We cannot controll the minds of our people!" Where in this Bill does it control the minds of the people? Come on Mr Buchanan answer! |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||
| yes | Total Seats: 145 | ||
| no |
Total Seats: 246 | ||
| abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
| Random fact: References to prominent real-life persons are not allowed. This includes references to philosophies featuring the name of a real-life person (eg. "Marxism", "Thatcherism", "Keynesianism"). |
| Random quote: "Taxes, after all, are dues that we pay for the privileges of membership in an organized society." - Franklin D. Roosevelt |