We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Progressive Reform Bill - Industrial De-regulation
Details
Submitted by[?]: Progressive Party
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: January 2139
Description[?]:
| To allow the market forces to take its rightful role in the directing the Likatonian economy. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy on advertising
Old value:: Only governmental organisation advertising is permitted.
Current: All advertising is permitted.
Proposed: All advertising is permitted.
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change Energy regulation.
Old value:: Energy is provided by nationalised companies.
Current: Energy is provided by private companies but the prices they can charge are regulated.
Proposed: Energy is provided by private companies which are not subject to any special regulations.
Article 3
Proposal[?] to change Policy concerning industrial hemp.
Old value:: Only regulated agribusinesses may produce industrial hemp.
Current: Industrial hemp regulations are left up to local governments.
Proposed: There are no regulations on industrial hemp.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 02:36:02, November 08, 2005 CET | From | Front for State Prosperity | To | Debating the Progressive Reform Bill - Industrial De-regulation |
| Message | This has the wholehearted support of the Pragmatic Capitalist Party. |
| Date | 13:56:20, November 08, 2005 CET | From | AM Radical Libertarian Party | To | Debating the Progressive Reform Bill - Industrial De-regulation |
| Message | The RLP supports fully all measures. |
| Date | 16:35:14, November 08, 2005 CET | From | Commonwealth Workers Army | To | Debating the Progressive Reform Bill - Industrial De-regulation |
| Message | The AAS opposes. How can you claim 'market forces', and yet regulate prices? This is a transparent attempt to return recent legislation to the prior status quo, not to innovate or enhance. |
| Date | 19:01:21, November 08, 2005 CET | From | Progressive Party | To | Debating the Progressive Reform Bill - Industrial De-regulation |
| Message | That's a valid point. We'll change article 2 to de-regulate energy prices too, even though we previously thought that the energy market was too important to not be regulated. |
| Date | 05:12:08, November 09, 2005 CET | From | Representative Party | To | Debating the Progressive Reform Bill - Industrial De-regulation |
| Message | We weill support this bill |
| Date | 09:00:41, November 10, 2005 CET | From | Right Wing Liberals Party | To | Debating the Progressive Reform Bill - Industrial De-regulation |
| Message | Article 2. Heard of Pollutants? |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||||
| yes |
Total Seats: 266 | ||||
| no | Total Seats: 33 | ||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 201 |
| Random fact: RP laws follow the same passing rules as in-game variable laws. Laws that are not of a constitutional nature require a simple majority "Yes" vote from active parties currently holding seats. Laws that are of a constitutional nature require a 2/3 majority "Yes" vote from active parties currently holding seats. RP laws may be abolished a simple majority vote this applies to ANY RP law. |
| Random quote: "Communism needs democracy like the human body needs oxygen." - Leon Trotsky |