Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: May 5461
Next month in: 01:20:16
Server time: 10:39:43, March 29, 2024 CET
Currently online (3): hnp19 | Kiwiis | MyungLuth | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Repeal of "SR-91:IUT" Act

Details

Submitted by[?]: Coalition for National Unity [CNU]

Status[?]: passed

Votes: This bill is a resolution. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: June 2950

Description[?]:

The Senate Sovereign of the Federal Republic of Solentia does hereby repeal: Senate Resolution 91- Illegalization of Undemocratic Titles [http://classic.particracy.net/viewbill.php?billid=219549].

The Senate finds that this Act is an expression of undemocratic statute law that binds the Senate in an unseemly way and rejects a current Senate majority. We find this to be an infringement of Senatorial Sovereignty. This Repealing Act does not state support or opposition for the actual policies of SR-91, only it's binding of the future Senate.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date19:25:30, June 06, 2010 CET
From Utilitarian Party of Solentia
ToDebating the Repeal of "SR-91:IUT" Act
MessageWe wonder why the CMP didn't notice we had already included a better prepared bill on the same subject. If the CMP is against inter-partisan cooperation on a topic we had already addressed, then we see no reason to support its bill which doesn't include a thorough research on the topic. We believe the CMP is ill prepared and they should inform themselves on this delicate topic.

Date19:40:31, June 06, 2010 CET
From Coalition for National Unity [CNU]
ToDebating the Repeal of "SR-91:IUT" Act
Message"As we have already stated, this Act should be repealed before we start messing about with challenging the 2/3 majority provision. Perhaps the UPS would like to encourage bills like this to stand-in-nSenate? I was under the impression they opposed it. A mixed message indeed."

Sen. Keith Juras, Justice Spokesman.

Date20:00:20, June 06, 2010 CET
From Conservative Party of Solentia
ToDebating the Repeal of "SR-91:IUT" Act
Message"The CPS shall support this repeal as well as a future bill declaring a requirement of more votes to repeal than to pass illegal."

Senator Grant Randall

Date22:57:33, June 06, 2010 CET
From Utilitarian Party of Solentia
ToDebating the Repeal of "SR-91:IUT" Act
MessageHow many votes will this bill need to be approved?

Date23:09:23, June 06, 2010 CET
From Conservative Party of Solentia
ToDebating the Repeal of "SR-91:IUT" Act
Message"Section III, Article 2 of SR 91 states that it shall only be overturned by a 2/3rds majority of the Senate, so the CPS assumes that the CMP requires 66 'yes' votes in order for this repeal to be successful."

CPS Chairwoman Andrea Bryant

Date23:49:25, June 06, 2010 CET
From Conservative Party of Solentia
ToDebating the Repeal of "SR-91:IUT" Act
MessageOOC: 67* not 66.

Date00:00:15, June 07, 2010 CET
From Utilitarian Party of Solentia
ToDebating the Repeal of "SR-91:IUT" Act
MessageSo, will we be respecting the original spirit of the bill?

Date00:26:21, June 07, 2010 CET
From Utilitarian Party of Solentia
ToDebating the Repeal of "SR-91:IUT" Act
MessageOOC: I meant, do we need the 2/3 to override it?

Date00:38:45, June 07, 2010 CET
From Conservative Party of Solentia
ToDebating the Repeal of "SR-91:IUT" Act
MessageOOC: Yes. 67 votes and it is repealed, 66 and it stays.

Date00:43:23, June 07, 2010 CET
From Utilitarian Party of Solentia
ToDebating the Repeal of "SR-91:IUT" Act
MessageThe Utilitarian Party of Solentia is against Section III article 2 of SR 91 bill. However, under the current system nothing illegal has happened. We oppose titles and peerage. If the CMP needs our support in order to reach the 2/3 required to repeal the aforementioned bill, we must say it loud and clear: You refused our offer and we see no need to repeal the act. We therefore have no further interest in the subject.

Date17:40:23, June 07, 2010 CET
From Social Renewal Party
ToDebating the Repeal of "SR-91:IUT" Act
MessageThe Left Radicals are torn on this issue.

We support the prohibition on redundant titles and will oppose any attempt to legislate their resurrection.
We do not support the binding of future Senates with unnecessary requirements of 2/3rds majorities to overturn legislation.

We will begrudgingly vote 'No' in order to prevent the reintroduction of titles.

Date08:13:15, June 08, 2010 CET
From Utilitarian Party of Solentia
ToDebating the Repeal of "SR-91:IUT" Act
MessageSeeing it is not likely the ban of tittles is lifted, we do recommend all parties to express their opinion concerning the principle of discontinuity; it could easily solve problems like this one, while at the same time preventing the current and most actual ban to be lifted, since section II article 3 would not be in order.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
   

Total Seats: 55

no
   

Total Seats: 29

abstain
   

Total Seats: 16


Random fact: It is the collective responsibility of the players in a nation to ensure all currently binding RP laws are clearly outlined in an OOC reference bill in the "Bills under debate" section of the nation page. Confusion should not be created by displaying only some of the current RP laws or displaying RP laws which are no longer current.

Random quote: "The answer to global warming is in the abolition of private property and production for human need. A socialist world would place an enormous priority on alternative energy sources. This is what ecologically-minded socialists have been exploring for quite some time now." - Louis Proyect

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 63