We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Public gathering act 2952 - second version
Details
Submitted by[?]: United Forces of Decay
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: March 2953
Description[?]:
| .... |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The citizens' right to assemble in public.
Old value:: There are no restrictions on the right of citizens to assemble in groups.
Current: The police may disperse a group if they believe it poses a potential risk to public safety.
Proposed: The police may disperse a group without giving any reason.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 00:59:47, June 12, 2010 CET | From | Labour Party | To | Debating the Public gathering act 2952 - second version |
| Message | Madam Speaker, we will not back down. Even if the police batter us, we will not back down. These beasts want to take away our precious democracy and our salvatory freedom, but we will not back down! We utterly refuse! The government must be afraid of the people, not the people of the government! The Christian Labour Party has no intentions of ceasing our protests, even with the given laws! |
| Date | 01:13:10, June 12, 2010 CET | From | Hutorian Conservative Party | To | Debating the Public gathering act 2952 - second version |
| Message | Madam Speaker, where when the NSC/UFD have 58% of the peoples approval are we not approving democracy? Did we create chaos when Labour were in power? No we didnt. Labour with 18% of the vote are the lowest represented party in Hutori and they are holding the state to ransom? Truly a sickening situation that leaves us with little choice but to introduce radical bills. Nowhere is the state removing democracy! Another Labour arguement that reflects their party - stupid! |
| Date | 13:07:23, June 12, 2010 CET | From | Labour Party | To | Debating the Public gathering act 2952 - second version |
| Message | Madam Speaker, The reason the NSC did not cause chaos when we where in government is because we governed fairly, justly and above all, with the interest of the people at heart! How is the government serving the people by banning their faith? Can the prime minister answer why he is going against the wishes of 43.1% of the citizens of this country? Religion does not in any way affect those who choose not to participate in it! so why should he revoke it from the 43.1% of people who follow it! |
| Date | 13:08:05, June 12, 2010 CET | From | Labour Party | To | Debating the Public gathering act 2952 - second version |
| Message | Madam Speaker, The reason the NSC did not cause chaos when we where in government is because we governed fairly, justly and above all, with the interest of the people at heart! How is the government serving the people by banning their faith? Can the prime minister answer why he is going against the wishes of 43.1% of the citizens of this country? Religion does not in any way affect those who choose not to participate in it! so why should he revoke it from the 43.1% of people who follow it! |
| Date | 13:09:50, June 12, 2010 CET | From | Hutorian Conservative Party | To | Debating the Public gathering act 2952 - second version |
| Message | Rt Hon Baron Mancini MP, NSC Frontbencher, Madam Speaker, the democratic system in Hutori is MAJORITY RULE. According to Labour 43.1% of people ARE religous which means 56.9% are not. The majority of people are on the NSC/UFD side of the arguement so its just a matter of the stubborness of Labour that there is a problem, because the majority of Hutori accept this Bill, so why cant they? |
| Date | 23:40:28, June 12, 2010 CET | From | Labour Party | To | Debating the Public gathering act 2952 - second version |
| Message | Madam Speaker, I do not believe that the majority of people do! This VIPER is twisting his facts! Prove to me you advertised this bill before the last election, and I will concede! |
| Date | 23:44:06, June 12, 2010 CET | From | Hutorian Conservative Party | To | Debating the Public gathering act 2952 - second version |
| Message | Madam Speaker, Labour seem to be annoyed they have faded into the political background. The NSC was not elected to introduce this Bill specifically but because of Labour actions, we have no choice. If Labour had not incited hatred and trying to divide Hutori over an issue that not even 50% of the people want! My goodness Labour are deluded and the NSC will sufficiently deal with them. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | ||
| yes | Total Seats: 226 | ||
| no |
Total Seats: 71 | ||
| abstain | Total Seats: 94 |
| Random fact: Players have a responsibility to differentiate between OOC (out-of-character) and IC (in-character) behaviour, and to make clear when they are communicating in OOC or IC terms. Since Particracy is a role-playing game, IC excesses are generally fine, but OOC attacks are not. However, players must not presume this convention permits them to harass a player with IC remarks that have a clear OOC context. |
| Random quote: "It is not titles that honor men, but men that honor titles." - Niccolo Machiavelli |