Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: January 5480
Next month in: 02:47:15
Server time: 17:12:44, May 07, 2024 CET
Currently online (2): Caoimhean | R Drax | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Ecology Act (2137)

Details

Submitted by[?]: Deltarian Nationalist Party

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: November 2138

Description[?]:

This act will preserve the beauty of Hobrazia for future generations. Polution will be lowered, hunting will be banned and GM crops will be banned to preserve the delicate eco-system. Domestic animals will have to be registered to try and prevent mistreatment of animals and wild animals that are dangerous will be banned to protect the public.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date18:36:15, November 08, 2005 CET
FromUnited Blobs
ToDebating the Ecology Act (2137)
MessageNo, no, no, no, no.
*Waits until someone else gets annoyed at having to vote aginst their beliefs*

Date18:47:17, November 08, 2005 CET
FromWe Say So! Party
ToDebating the Ecology Act (2137)
MessageOk, we've gone over this before...NO MULTIPLE PROPOSAL BILLS!!!

Date19:17:38, November 08, 2005 CET
FromDeltarian Nationalist Party
ToDebating the Ecology Act (2137)
MessageI don't see anything wrong with it, i want rapid sweeping reforms, anyway it will be put back to debate phase by the election and i can change bits that you want changed.

Date19:57:12, November 08, 2005 CET
FromUnited Blobs
ToDebating the Ecology Act (2137)
MessageWhy did you put it to vote then?

Date21:16:36, November 08, 2005 CET
FromDeltarian Nationalist Party
ToDebating the Ecology Act (2137)
MessageI was curious to see if putting it to vote and voting in it would make any difference in the election.

Date21:22:40, November 08, 2005 CET
FromUnited Blobs
ToDebating the Ecology Act (2137)
MessageIt shouldn't - Bills only have effects when they reach their deadline.

Date21:41:54, November 08, 2005 CET
FromDeltarian Nationalist Party
ToDebating the Ecology Act (2137)
MessageWell i understand that now. What do you not agree with in the bill?

Date22:11:10, November 08, 2005 CET
FromUnited Blobs
ToDebating the Ecology Act (2137)
Message1) - Don't really see the purpose of registration
2) - We prefer letting the consumer choose between foods
3) - We see no reasons for banning hunting of non-endangered species
4) - High pollution restrictions lead to less money to develop cleaner industry = slower technological change (Source: Wouter on forums dicussing possible implementation)
5) - We want a total ban on this rather than the half-hearted attempt proposed.

Date23:42:30, November 08, 2005 CET
FromWe Say So! Party
ToDebating the Ecology Act (2137)
MessageBut you won;t get rapid sweeping reforms because if you put too many articles together, you just get people voting against the bill in order to stop the parts they don't want getting through and just putting the individual parts up that they do want. That, and it's just plain annoying.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
  

Total Seats: 123

no
    

Total Seats: 143

abstain
  

Total Seats: 134


Random fact: Submitting a bill without any proposals in it will not attract or detract voters. It will not raise your visibility or change your political position.

Random quote: "If we don't believe in freedom of expression for people we despise, we don't believe in it at all." - Noam Chomsky

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 70