We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: BPA Agenda BIll September 2958
Details
Submitted by[?]: Baltusian Pantian Alliance
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: May 2959
Description[?]:
almost 900 years and Pantianism still marches on. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy concerning the use of chemical and biological weaponry in warfare.
Old value:: The nation shall never use chemical or biological weapons in warfare unless another nation uses them first.
Current: The nation reserves the right to use chemical or biological weapons in warfare for any reason.
Proposed: The nation shall never use chemical or biological weaponry in warfare.
Article 2
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy concerning the use of nuclear weaponry in warfare.
Old value:: The nation reserves the right to nuclear weapons in retaliation to a nuclear, chemical or biological attack.
Current: The nation reserves the right to use nuclear weapons in warfare for any reason.
Proposed: The nation shall never use nuclear weapons in warfare.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 08:35:42, June 24, 2010 CET | From | Baltusian Pantian Alliance | To | Debating the BPA Agenda BIll September 2958 |
Message | These Implements dehumanize war taking us away from the real costs and benefits from the act. To create war a country must be willing to back it with blood and toil lest we lose rationality of cause. |
Date | 16:30:28, June 24, 2010 CET | From | Unión Democrática | To | Debating the BPA Agenda BIll September 2958 |
Message | That is a very fascinating statement made by my Pantian colleague, but does not really address the legislation at hand. The way the act stands now, war is not dehumanised, it is made safer. Other nations will be less likely to dehumanise a conflict with Baltusia knowing we may retaliate in kind. In essence, the current legislation supports my Pantian colleague's view of war as it should be, as opposed to putting us at the mercies of less scrupulous war-making nations. -Carlos Estuardo Tory Shadow Defense Secretary |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | ||
yes | Total Seats: 223 | ||
no |
Total Seats: 237 | ||
abstain | Total Seats: 290 |
Random fact: The influence a bill has on elections decreases over time, until it eventually is no longer relevant. This can explain shifts in your party's position to the electorate and your visibility. |
Random quote: "For among other evils caused by being disarmed, it renders you contemptible; which is one of those disgraceful things which a prince must guard against." - Niccolo Machiavelli |