We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Motion to vote

Details

Submitted by^[?]: Conservative Republic Independent Party

Status^[?]: passed

Votes: This bill is a resolution. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: April 2048

Description^[?]:

This bill makes a requirement of a motion to vote on a bill while in the debate phase if the bill has a proposal or more than one proposal. Without a motion, the bill cannot be put up for a vote if it has a proposal. This will make unneccesary legislation harder to comeby.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date	08:53:41, May 02, 2005 CET
From	People's Progressive Party
To	Debating the Motion to vote
Message	This would be difficult to enforce if passed especially when new parties register in the nation without prior knowledge of this protocal if it passes. I recommend dropping this one simply because of its unenforceability.

Date	10:03:45, May 02, 2005 CET
From	National Democratic Party
To	Debating the Motion to vote
Message	Yes I agree with the PPP

Date	15:48:44, May 02, 2005 CET
From	Social Democrat Party
To	Debating the Motion to vote
Message	me too.

Date	17:00:10, May 02, 2005 CET
From	Conservative Republic Independent Party
To	Debating the Motion to vote
Message	If you merely want to pass a legislation to vote you can form an alliance with someone to have them forward a motion to vote. It just keeps us in check and allows for unnecessary legislation to be dismissed from vote.

Date	21:39:19, May 02, 2005 CET
From	People's Progressive Party
To	Debating the Motion to vote
Message	Yeah but how will you get parties to agree to it. It would have to function on an honor system.

Date	09:16:07, May 03, 2005 CET
From	Conservative Republic Independent Party
To	Debating the Motion to vote
Message	All you do is say in the debate phase that I motion to vote.

Date	20:11:57, May 03, 2005 CET
From	People's Progressive Party
To	Debating the Motion to vote
Message	Well then in that case theres no harm in it, just a protocal check.

Date	04:27:46, May 06, 2005 CET
From	National Democratic Party
To	Debating the Motion to vote
Message	Oh ok then...I will vote yes.

Date	07:23:28, May 06, 2005 CET
From	Democratic Centre Party of Gaduridos
To	Debating the Motion to vote
Message	I'm not entirely sure of the purpose of this bill, but it seems harmless enough.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote

Seats

yes

Social Democrat Party (26)
Benevolent Totalitarian Party - FLF (26)
National Democratic Party (19)
Democratic Centre Party of Gaduridos (17)
Conservative Republic Independent Party (15)
People's Progressive Party (11)

Total Seats: 114

Total Seats: 0

abstain

Total Seats: 0

Random fact: Submitting a bill without any proposals in it will not attract or detract voters. It will not raise your visibility or change your political position.

Random quote: "Blah blah blah- I'm more of a Leftist than all you puppets... You support cops beating people down and kicking out all the foreigners..." - Omar al-Khali, former Kalistani politician

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 65