Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: January 5476
Next month in: 00:41:22
Server time: 19:18:37, April 27, 2024 CET
Currently online (2): hexaus18 | krankier | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Retirement Age Increase

Details

Submitted by[?]: SCI Libertarian-Socialist Syndicate (LL)

Status[?]: passed

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: June 2966

Description[?]:

To keep in step with longevity increases.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date19:58:45, July 06, 2010 CET
From Mountain Man Party
ToDebating the Retirement Age Increase
MessageWe were gonna to propose this. Why if I'm still working at my age, then everyone else can too.

Date05:22:24, July 07, 2010 CET
From Union Socialism Alliance
ToDebating the Retirement Age Increase
MessageBy age 60, most, if not all, have already been working for 30 years. We think that after 30 years, one should be able to spend time with their family. We could support, however, as medical advancement has made it possible to be able to work pass 60.

Date16:13:03, July 07, 2010 CET
From Art & Labour
ToDebating the Retirement Age Increase
MessageEr, retirement age is only the age at which you can recieve your pension, not the age at which you have to retire. Duh.

Date19:13:10, July 07, 2010 CET
From Union Socialism Alliance
ToDebating the Retirement Age Increase
MessageYes, but would someone want to retire at 60 if, for 5 years, he won't receive an income?

Date19:13:49, July 07, 2010 CET
From Union Socialism Alliance
ToDebating the Retirement Age Increase
MessageOOC: sorry, misread your comment, it was directed at the MMP, was it not?

Date16:55:10, July 08, 2010 CET
From Art & Labour
ToDebating the Retirement Age Increase
MessageYeah. Also, it means that the individual recieves both state pension and existing income, thereby increasing their overall wealth whilst they remain in work and indeed after work since much would become savings.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
    

Total Seats: 418

no
    

Total Seats: 332

abstain

    Total Seats: 0


    Random fact: http://www.fantasynamegenerators.com and http://www.behindthename.com/random are great resources for coming up with character names from unfamiliar cultures.

    Random quote: "It is difficult to get a man to understand something when his salary depends on his not understanding it." - Upton Sinclair

    This page was generated with PHP
    Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
    Queries performed: 54