We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Ratification of the Treaty for the Advancement of Women's Rights
Details
Submitted by[?]: Selucian Sovereignty Party
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This bill proposes for the ratification of a treaty. It will require two-thirds of the legislature to vote in favor[?]. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: November 2141
Description[?]:
This bill asks for the ratification of the <a href="viewtreaty.php?treatyid=110">Treaty for the Advancement of Women's Rights</a>. If this treaty is ratified, it becomes binding and will define national law. |
Proposals
Article 1
Ratify the Treaty for the Advancement of Women's Rights.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 23:42:17, November 09, 2005 CET | From | Selucian Liberty Party | To | Debating the Ratification of the Treaty for the Advancement of Women's Rights |
Message | Against Article 2. No need for the government to put a nursery in place |
Date | 14:40:05, November 10, 2005 CET | From | Selucian Sovereignty Party | To | Debating the Ratification of the Treaty for the Advancement of Women's Rights |
Message | Any other feedback? |
Date | 21:06:23, November 13, 2005 CET | From | Seleucus Nicator | To | Debating the Ratification of the Treaty for the Advancement of Women's Rights |
Message | No complaints other than Article 2. The passage or failure of Pre-School Devolution Act could be considered a referendum on the Treaty, could it not? |
Date | 03:16:23, November 14, 2005 CET | From | Selucian Sovereignty Party | To | Debating the Ratification of the Treaty for the Advancement of Women's Rights |
Message | If the Pre-School Devolution Act passes, I believe that we are no longer entitled to ratify this bill. If it passes, I'll have to pull this bill from the floor (or keep it in abeyance indefinitely). |
Date | 05:11:09, November 14, 2005 CET | From | Green Moderate Party | To | Debating the Ratification of the Treaty for the Advancement of Women's Rights |
Message | We disagree with the principle behind article 1 and thus would not ratify this treaty. |
Date | 22:17:25, November 15, 2005 CET | From | Seleucus Nicator | To | Debating the Ratification of the Treaty for the Advancement of Women's Rights |
Message | As does the Victory Party, but we tried not to let social ideology interfere. |
Date | 23:58:43, November 15, 2005 CET | From | North Majatran Union Congress | To | Debating the Ratification of the Treaty for the Advancement of Women's Rights |
Message | The declaration is against this country's pre-School education policy and so we will be voting against it. |
Date | 02:56:21, November 16, 2005 CET | From | Selucian Sovereignty Party | To | Debating the Ratification of the Treaty for the Advancement of Women's Rights |
Message | I forgot about that. THis is a bug in the system - if we are not in compliance with the treaty, we should not be allowed to even vote on this. I should have pulled this from the floor entirely. My appologies to the assembly. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | |||||
yes | Total Seats: 176 | |||||
no |
Total Seats: 323 | |||||
abstain | Total Seats: 76 |
Random fact: If you are likely to be logging in to Particracy with the same IP address as another player with an active account, please inform Moderation on the forum. Otherwise your account could be inactivated on suspicion of multi-accounting. |
Random quote: "The radical right is so homophobic that they're blaming global warming on the AIDS quilt." - Dennis Miller |