Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: September 5573
Next month in: 00:09:20
Server time: 19:50:39, November 24, 2024 CET
Currently online (0): Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Ratification of the Treaty for the Advancement of Women's Rights

Details

Submitted by[?]: Selucian Sovereignty Party

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This bill proposes for the ratification of a treaty. It will require two-thirds of the legislature to vote in favor[?]. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: November 2141

Description[?]:

This bill asks for the ratification of the <a href="viewtreaty.php?treatyid=110">Treaty for the Advancement of Women's Rights</a>. If this treaty is ratified, it becomes binding and will define national law.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date23:42:17, November 09, 2005 CET
FromSelucian Liberty Party
ToDebating the Ratification of the Treaty for the Advancement of Women's Rights
MessageAgainst Article 2. No need for the government to put a nursery in place

Date14:40:05, November 10, 2005 CET
FromSelucian Sovereignty Party
ToDebating the Ratification of the Treaty for the Advancement of Women's Rights
MessageAny other feedback?

Date21:06:23, November 13, 2005 CET
FromSeleucus Nicator
ToDebating the Ratification of the Treaty for the Advancement of Women's Rights
MessageNo complaints other than Article 2. The passage or failure of Pre-School Devolution Act could be considered a referendum on the Treaty, could it not?

Date03:16:23, November 14, 2005 CET
FromSelucian Sovereignty Party
ToDebating the Ratification of the Treaty for the Advancement of Women's Rights
MessageIf the Pre-School Devolution Act passes, I believe that we are no longer entitled to ratify this bill. If it passes, I'll have to pull this bill from the floor (or keep it in abeyance indefinitely).

Date05:11:09, November 14, 2005 CET
FromGreen Moderate Party
ToDebating the Ratification of the Treaty for the Advancement of Women's Rights
MessageWe disagree with the principle behind article 1 and thus would not ratify this treaty.

Date22:17:25, November 15, 2005 CET
FromSeleucus Nicator
ToDebating the Ratification of the Treaty for the Advancement of Women's Rights
MessageAs does the Victory Party, but we tried not to let social ideology interfere.

Date23:58:43, November 15, 2005 CET
FromNorth Majatran Union Congress
ToDebating the Ratification of the Treaty for the Advancement of Women's Rights
MessageThe declaration is against this country's pre-School education policy and so we will be voting against it.

Date02:56:21, November 16, 2005 CET
FromSelucian Sovereignty Party
ToDebating the Ratification of the Treaty for the Advancement of Women's Rights
MessageI forgot about that. THis is a bug in the system - if we are not in compliance with the treaty, we should not be allowed to even vote on this. I should have pulled this from the floor entirely. My appologies to the assembly.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
 

Total Seats: 176

no
     

Total Seats: 323

abstain
  

Total Seats: 76


Random fact: If you are likely to be logging in to Particracy with the same IP address as another player with an active account, please inform Moderation on the forum. Otherwise your account could be inactivated on suspicion of multi-accounting.

Random quote: "The radical right is so homophobic that they're blaming global warming on the AIDS quilt." - Dennis Miller

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 64