Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: August 5475
Next month in: 01:04:52
Server time: 22:55:07, April 26, 2024 CET
Currently online (6): burgerboys | Dx6743 | HopesFor | Klexi | luthorian3059 | TaMan443 | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Congress Stimulus Bill

Details

Submitted by[?]: United Aldegar Progressive Movement

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This bill asks for an amendement to the Constitution. It will require two-thirds of the legislature to vote in favor. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: October 2979

Description[?]:

Increase number of seats in congress.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date22:54:09, July 29, 2010 CET
FromPeople's Party - Republican Democrats
ToDebating the Congress Stimulus Bill
MessageAnd why?

Date05:10:01, August 04, 2010 CET
FromAldegar Defense Party
ToDebating the Congress Stimulus Bill
Messagewhy not do you have an reason for why we shouldn't increase the seats when the population increases in parties and in virtual people.

Date06:41:10, August 04, 2010 CET
FromPeople's Party - Republican Democrats
ToDebating the Congress Stimulus Bill
MessageAs we have made no proposal we don't see why we would have to give a reason. However, we have so far not seen any convincing argument5 for increasing the size of our parliament. As we have mentioned before, the number of parties standing for election is no relaevant criterion, as the number of seats available has no effect on the relative strength of the parties. A party getting 20 per cent of the vote would still have about 20 per cent of the seats, no matter if 20 per cent means about 40 seats or about 70 seats.

Date20:57:10, August 04, 2010 CET
FromUnited Aldegar Progressive Movement
ToDebating the Congress Stimulus Bill
MessageSo basically you have no reason and are saying no just for the sake of arguing

Date22:34:24, August 04, 2010 CET
FromPeople's Party - Republican Democrats
ToDebating the Congress Stimulus Bill
MessageOur reasons for saying no are completely transparent. As we said before, here and elsewhere, we are opposed to this proposal because we have not been given any valid reason for increasing the size of parliament, and we are unlikely to change our position as long as no one makes the effort of presenting us with a good reason for supporting any similar proposal.

Date04:57:39, August 05, 2010 CET
FromUnited Aldegar Progressive Movement
ToDebating the Congress Stimulus Bill
MessageSo even if the bulk of the country is in acceptance of this you are saying no just because you can

Date08:34:36, August 05, 2010 CET
FromPeople's Party - Republican Democrats
ToDebating the Congress Stimulus Bill
MessageWe are saying no because we haven't been given a reason to say yes, and as this measure requires a 2/3 majority, the UAPM would be well advised to make an effort to convince instead of ttrying to shift the responsibility for providing a reason on us and claiming a non-existent majority.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
   

Total Seats: 50

no
  

Total Seats: 112

abstain
 

Total Seats: 37


Random fact: Particracy allows you to establish an unelected head of state like a monarch or a president-for-life, but doing this is a bit of a process. First elect a candidate with the name "." to the Head of State position. Then change your law on the "Structure of the executive branch" to "The head of state is hereditary and symbolic; the head of government chairs the cabinet" and change the "formal title of the head of state" to how you want the new head of state's title and name to appear (eg. King Percy XVI).

Random quote: "You don't have to buy from anyone. You don't have to work at any particular job. You don't have to participate in any given relationship. You can choose." - Harry Browne

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 55