We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Defense Privatization Act
Details
Submitted by[?]: New Aldurian Conservative Party
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: July 2139
Description[?]:
This bill will totally privatize the defense industry, phasing out subsidies put in place to assist the transition to private control. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The nation's defence industry.
Old value:: Defence industries are privately owned but subsidised by the state.
Current: The state owns all defence industries.
Proposed: Defence industries are privately owned and not subsidised.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 21:08:06, November 10, 2005 CET | From | Aldurian Libertarian Socialist Party | To | Debating the Defense Privatization Act |
Message | We'd like to abstain on this one. We don't want to promote privatisation, but we disdain subventions. At least, with the current law, we can restricts the endeavors and orient the private firms to suit our needs instead of being induced by these firms to buy unadapted equipment so we will oppose. |
Date | 01:20:15, November 11, 2005 CET | From | United Socialist Front | To | Debating the Defense Privatization Act |
Message | Defense is of National importance, as such, Defence should be a National Industry. And it's size, proportional to the Budget we set it. Imagine factories of private manufcturers during war. Then Peace. What do they do? they sell to the public, to other countries, for profit, regardless of their dangers. Examples abound in our world. Let's not let this happen to Alduria. ... But i am totally off this topic. We shall vote no. If only to keep the Government in for future Nationalisation. |
Date | 09:53:32, November 11, 2005 CET | From | Market Socialist Party | To | Debating the Defense Privatization Act |
Message | We agree...we don't see any reason to subsidize a failing defense industry if they cannot not build competetive weapons, which is the point of having defense industries in the first place. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | |||
yes | Total Seats: 222 | |||
no |
Total Seats: 179 | |||
abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
Random fact: Real-life places should not be referenced in Particracy. |
Random quote: "The fate of the living planet is the most important issue facing mankind". - Gaylord Nelson |