Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: October 5475
Next month in: 03:25:45
Server time: 04:34:14, April 27, 2024 CET
Currently online (1): hexaus18 | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Worker's Rights Bill (2) 2138

Details

Submitted by[?]: Worker's Freedom Alliance

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: October 2139

Description[?]:

Working people must be allowed to stand together to defend their interests

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date22:32:00, November 10, 2005 CET
From Socialist Republic Party
ToDebating the Worker's Rights Bill (2) 2138
Messagediagree

Date23:24:21, November 10, 2005 CET
From Progressive Party
ToDebating the Worker's Rights Bill (2) 2138
MessageI would agree, but it is also noticable that this just got changed very recently.

Date00:29:42, November 11, 2005 CET
From Roman Imperialist Party
ToDebating the Worker's Rights Bill (2) 2138
MessageHeavily against. Workers stick to their own strikes. We can't have the nation shutting down because the Plumber'sUnion wants to go on a sympathy strike for the Teacher's Union....

Date13:25:34, November 11, 2005 CET
From People's Democratic Party
ToDebating the Worker's Rights Bill (2) 2138
MessageWe disagree with this.

Date13:57:20, November 11, 2005 CET
From Worker's Freedom Alliance
ToDebating the Worker's Rights Bill (2) 2138
MessageThe employers work together to beat strikes and organise scab labour - the workers will stand together too. Scrap all anti-union laws

Date13:58:25, November 11, 2005 CET
From Worker's Freedom Alliance
ToDebating the Worker's Rights Bill (2) 2138
MessageProgressive party, despite the recent change this is a fundamental issue of workers rights, do I have your support?

Date14:28:49, November 11, 2005 CET
From Progressive Party
ToDebating the Worker's Rights Bill (2) 2138
MessageYes my support is there.

Date19:50:41, November 11, 2005 CET
From Roman Imperialist Party
ToDebating the Worker's Rights Bill (2) 2138
MessageThe Imperialist Party is against this.

Date00:57:21, November 12, 2005 CET
From Labor Party
ToDebating the Worker's Rights Bill (2) 2138
MessageNow that we have more Union supporting Parties in our Nation its time the workers got the proper rights they deserve and get a fairer treatment from employers. We agreed with this Bill.

Date13:50:13, November 12, 2005 CET
From New Daio Party
ToDebating the Worker's Rights Bill (2) 2138
MessageSure, let's allow people that are simply unrespected at their jobs, who would do well simply to be better recognized and better treated the ability to continue to raise their salaries and benefits. Out of powerful unions grows only the ruin of economies. Those saying they fight for the little man will in the end only prevent him from rising, for there is nowhere to rise to. Firmly, staunchly, unbelievably AGAINST.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
   

Total Seats: 156

no
   

Total Seats: 253

abstain
  

Total Seats: 92


Random fact: Hundreds of vessels were lost while traversing the cold waters of the Sea of Lost Souls. It is located between Seleya and Majatra.

Random quote: "A countryman between two lawyers is like a fish between two cats." - Benjamin Franklin

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 81