We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Internet Provider
Details
Submitted by[?]: Sue's Corner
Status[?]: passed
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: September 2982
Description[?]:
| Presented by the Science and Technology Minister Stanley Dobbings. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The government's policy on internet service providers (ISPs).
Old value:: The state owns and operates a national internet service provider, alongside private ISPs.
Current: Private companies provide internet service throughout the nation, without government interference.
Proposed: Private companies provide internet service throughout the nation, without government interference.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 00:06:18, August 10, 2010 CET | From |  Sue's Corner | To | Debating the Internet Provider |
| Message | It is our firm belief, that private companies should have the right to own and run all internet service providers. It cannot be the case in this day and age, that the government not only owns internet providers, but can control the content of internet and regulation in this unfair and interfering way. We therefore think this measure is long overdue. Stanley Dobbings Science and Technology Secretary |
| Date | 00:42:08, August 10, 2010 CET | From | Nuncpart Total Control Authority | To | Debating the Internet Provider |
| Message | Cosmo Silvestre, Purveyor of Agnus Dei: "I am not sure this is even a conservative policy - more ultra-liberal economics. The Revolution requires control of all services - for the sake of the People and its security - and is therefore greatly opposed to this heinous act." |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||||
| yes | Total Seats: 58 | |||||
| no |
Total Seats: 42 | |||||
| abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
| Random fact: Players consent to the reasonable and predictable consequences of the role-play they consent to. For example, players who role-play their characters as committing criminal offences should expect those characters to experience the predictable judicial consequences of that. |
| Random quote: "The most radical revolutionary will become a conservative the day after the revolution." - Hannah Arendt |