Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: September 5475
Next month in: 01:53:16
Server time: 02:06:43, April 27, 2024 CET
Currently online (0): Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Senate Resolution 201: Workers' Liberties Identification Act

Details

Submitted by[?]: Federal Independent Party

Status[?]: defeated

Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.

Voting deadline: July 2985

Description[?]:

SR 201: WLIA

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date11:29:59, August 16, 2010 CET
From Social Justice Party
ToDebating the Senate Resolution 201: Workers' Liberties Identification Act
MessageThe SDLP cannot support Article 2 of this bill, we believe that this would lead to the destabilisation and fracturing of the unions as well as their ability to operate in a democratic, cohesive fashion. We would fully support a revised bill leaving out article 2.

Regards,
Allan Krom
SDLP Trade and Industry Spokesperson

Date18:33:21, August 16, 2010 CET
From Federal Independent Party
ToDebating the Senate Resolution 201: Workers' Liberties Identification Act
MessageWith respect to Mr. Krom, Article 2 is in fact a step to protect union members and their respective trade union from over bureaucratic regulation by the Ministry of Trade & Industry. By requiring a drawn out voting session in which the union is forced to abide by a federal arbitrator who in fact in may indeed be a corporate bourgeoisie appointee by a reactionary force, the union risks its ability to competitively play in the business world. This unnecessary regulation only allows businesses more time to crush union attempts and to replace workers with scabs.

Also, most unions require a vote regardless of the law as it is written into their electoral process. Should that be broken, a union member may report such activity and work from within the union to amend the issue. Unions are a highly democratic force and can be trusted to regulate themselves.

Ultimately, I hope that you will see that this is nothing more than an attempt to keep the workers from winning their battles.

FIP Senator Marc Vetal

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
  

Total Seats: 13

no
     

Total Seats: 77

abstain
 

Total Seats: 10


Random fact: "Treaty-locking", or ratifiying treaties that completely or nearly completely forbid any proposals to change laws, is not allowed. Amongst other possible sanctions, Moderation reserves the discretion to delete treaties and/or subject parties to a seat reset if this is necessary in order to reverse a treaty-lock situation.

Random quote: "With this faith we will be able to work together, to pray together, to struggle together, to go to jail together, to stand up for freedom together, knowing that we will be free one day." - Martin Luther King Jr.

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 63