We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Coalition Government
Details
Submitted by[?]: Sue's Corner
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This bill asks for an amendement to the Constitution. It will require two-thirds of the legislature to vote in favor. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: January 2987
Description[?]:
Coleen Power |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The constitutional right and responsibility to propose a cabinet to the legislature.
Old value:: Only the Head of State can propose a cabinet coalition.
Current: Only the largest party can propose a cabinet.
Proposed: Each party can propose a cabinet coalition.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
Date | 17:41:25, August 18, 2010 CET | From | Nuncpart Supreme Congress | To | Debating the Coalition Government |
Message | "Although the Nuncirist Party maintains a policy of non-interference in the constitutional activities of the illegitimate body that calls itself the Federal Republic, in this instance we believe that this change may be beneficial for the movement's future." The Voice of Deus |
Date | 17:43:41, August 18, 2010 CET | From | Sue's Corner | To | Debating the Coalition Government |
Message | We agree, in this election example, we have thelargest party and most support among the public, yet don't have head of state and cannot form a government. This has got to show we need at least the largest party forming government, if not all parties. Parties should be allowed to negotiate a majority with other parties and present to the senate for approval. Coleen Power |
Date | 17:48:18, August 18, 2010 CET | From | Coalition for National Unity [CNU] | To | Debating the Coalition Government |
Message | "There is, of course, the counter argument that despite being the largest party, the Conservatives do not have a majority of the public behind them. However, Supreme President Taberon, did win an election with a majority of the voting public backing him. That said, we believe that the legislature should drive the Executive and be the force behind it. Thus, we shall support in principle of constitutional theory, though not in principle of electoral analysis which we feel works against the Conservative argument." Henry, Lord Kennedy, CMP Senatorial Lead and Chairman. |
Date | 17:59:57, August 18, 2010 CET | From | Sue's Corner | To | Debating the Coalition Government |
Message | We disagree with you there, but are glad of your support. Sylvia O Hara Party Leader |
Date | 18:04:56, August 18, 2010 CET | From | Meritocratic Alliance | To | Debating the Coalition Government |
Message | Some of us vote still on principle, not political expedience. |
Date | 18:09:34, August 18, 2010 CET | From | Sue's Corner | To | Debating the Coalition Government |
Message | I am voting on principle. It has long been our parties position that any party should be allowed to prpose a cabinet, as this will allow for 51% of parties to form a government ensuring a constant cabinet majority. Unless you refer not to us, but to the weak willed CMP, who we agree have no backbone on any issues. Sylvia O Hara Party Leader |
Date | 18:11:35, August 18, 2010 CET | From | Meritocratic Alliance | To | Debating the Coalition Government |
Message | It was not directed to anyone in particular. Senator Adams |
Date | 10:17:42, August 19, 2010 CET | From | Social Justice Party | To | Debating the Coalition Government |
Message | The SDLP has always supported this principle, and whilst we fear what it may bring in this electoral cycle will stand by what we have advocated in the past. Walton Laboissonnier SDLP Senate Leader |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
Vote | Seats | ||||
yes |
Total Seats: 56 | ||||
no | Total Seats: 33 | ||||
abstain | Total Seats: 11 |
Random fact: Real life-life nationalities, cultures or ethnicities should not be referenced in Particracy (eg. "German"). |
Random quote: "In politics, madame, you need two things: friends, but above all an enemy." - Brian Mulroney |