Main | About | Tutorial | FAQ | Links | Wiki | Forum | World News | World Map | World Ranking | Nations | Electoral Calendar | Party Organizations | Treaties |
Login | Register |
Game Time: September 5573
Next month in: 01:14:05
Server time: 18:45:54, November 24, 2024 CET
Currently online (3): JourneyKan | Mindus | VojmatDunDSU | Record: 63 on 23:13:00, July 26, 2019 CET

We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.

Bill: Budget proposal of June 3000

Details

Submitted by[?]: Socialist Alliance

Status[?]: passed

Votes: This bill proposes to change the allocation of funds in the budget. It requires more than half of the legislature to vote yes. This bill will pass as soon as the required yes votes are in, or will be defeated if unsufficient votes are reached on the deadline.

Voting deadline: February 3001

Description[?]:

The Socialist Alliance propose to adjust the government's spending budget to better address the economic and social situation of the Republica Federativa de Aloria.

Proposals

Debate

These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:

Date23:31:17, September 15, 2010 CET
From Free Democratic People's Party
ToDebating the Budget proposal of June 3000
MessageThere's no way you can finance this without robbing the people

Date23:33:02, September 15, 2010 CET
From Socialist Alliance
ToDebating the Budget proposal of June 3000
MessageThe people voted for a Socialist government. This is the will of the people. We rob from the rich to give to the poor. We have lowered taxes for the poorest and will give to them in the form of state services. We are trying to build social-democracy

Date18:40:55, September 16, 2010 CET
From Free Democratic People's Party
ToDebating the Budget proposal of June 3000
MessageWhat's so social about making succesful people less succesful? By the way, the FDPP still has 45 % of the electorate.

subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe

Voting

Vote Seats
yes
 

Total Seats: 137

no
 

Total Seats: 113

abstain
 

Total Seats: 0


Random fact: Real-life organisations should not be referenced in Particracy, unless they are simple and generic (eg. "National Organisation for Women" is allowed).

Random quote: "Those who are responsible for the national security must be the sole judges of what the national security requires. It would be obviously undesirable that such matters should be made the subject of evidence in a court of law or otherwise discussed in public." - Unattributed member of the the House of Lords on the removal of trade union rights

This page was generated with PHP
Copyright 2004-2010 Wouter Lievens
Queries performed: 47