We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Cabinet Proposal of November 3001
Details
Submitted by[?]: United Christian Republican Party
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This bill presents the formation of a cabinet. It requires more than half of the legislature to vote yes. Traditionally, parties in the proposal vote yes, others (the opposition) vote no. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: July 3002
Description[?]:
| Proposing a Cabinet |
Proposals
Article 1
The responsibilites of Head of Government will be conducted by the 
Democratic Party
Article 2
The responsibilites of Science and Technology will be conducted by the Democratic Party
Article 3
The responsibilites of Food and Agriculture will be conducted by the Democratic Party
Article 4
The responsibilites of Environment and Tourism will be conducted by the United Christian Republican Party
Article 5
The responsibilites of Trade and Industry will be conducted by the Democratic Party
Article 6
The responsibilites of Foreign Affairs will be conducted by the United Christian Republican Party
Article 7
The responsibilites of Internal Affairs will be conducted by the United Christian Republican Party
Article 8
The responsibilites of Finance will be conducted by the United Christian Republican Party
Article 9
The responsibilites of Defence will be conducted by the United Christian Republican Party
Article 10
The responsibilites of Justice will be conducted by the United Christian Republican Party
Article 11
The responsibilites of Infrastructure and Transport will be conducted by the Democratic Party
Article 12
The responsibilites of Health and Social Services will be conducted by the Democratic Party
Article 13
The responsibilites of Education and Culture will be conducted by the Democratic Party
Article 14
Proposal[?] to change Government-issued identity card policy.
Old value:: Citizens are issued with identity cards on a voluntary basis.
Current: All citizens are issued with identity cards and are required to carry them at all times.
Proposed: All citizens are issued with identity cards but are not required to carry them.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 16:33:07, September 18, 2010 CET | From | Democratic Party | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of November 3001 |
| Message | We are flattered by such proposal. However, we would have liked to have seen the other party that is not the Anti-Revolutionary party included in such proposal. |
| Date | 16:34:05, September 18, 2010 CET | From | Democratic Party | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of November 3001 |
| Message | And thus, with regret, vote against. |
| Date | 16:35:12, September 18, 2010 CET | From | United Christian Republican Party | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of November 3001 |
| Message | Actually thats a good idea, should we just divide every thing up evenly with the other party, so that the three of us have equal duties? Btw who wants to be Vice Chancellor? |
| Date | 16:40:22, September 18, 2010 CET | From | Democratic Party | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of November 3001 |
| Message | Yes, we should negotiate. However, I must voice concerns on behalf of my party before doing so. We see the "Free Values Party" and the "Saridani People's Alliance" as key partners, but feel that your party names, respectively, are unclear. And therefore we urge that more tradition titles, such as "Conservative", "Liberal", "Democratic" and such are adopted instead. Although we recognise that we are in no position to tell other parties what to do. Mathematically, two parties would get 4 positions and one 5. We feel the party with the position of Head of Government should be the party with 4 positions. Or, the party with Head of Government could have three positions and the others 5, to make it more fair. |
| Date | 16:40:26, September 18, 2010 CET | From | Democratic Party | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of November 3001 |
| Message | Yes, we should negotiate. However, I must voice concerns on behalf of my party before doing so. We see the "Free Values Party" and the "Saridani People's Alliance" as key partners, but feel that your party names, respectively, are unclear. And therefore we urge that more tradition titles, such as "Conservative", "Liberal", "Democratic" and such are adopted instead. Although we recognise that we are in no position to tell other parties what to do. Mathematically, two parties would get 4 positions and one 5. We feel the party with the position of Head of Government should be the party with 4 positions. Or, the party with Head of Government could have three positions and the others 5, to make it more fair. |
| Date | 16:40:46, September 18, 2010 CET | From | Democratic Party | To | Debating the Cabinet Proposal of November 3001 |
| Message | (OOC: Apologies for the double post) |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||
| yes | Total Seats: 0 | |||
| no | Total Seats: 0 | |||
| abstain | Total Seats: 0 |
| Random fact: It is forbidden to impersonate a player or Moderator. |
| Random quote: "What are you trying to protect heterosexual marriages from? There isn't a limited amount of love in Iowa. It isn't a non-renewable resource. If Amy and Barbara or Mike and Steve love each other, it doesn't mean that John and Mary can't." - Ed Fallon |