We are working on a brand new version of the game! If you want to stay informed, read our blog and register for our mailing list.
Bill: Freedom to Wear Religions Clothing Bill
Details
Submitted by[?]: Dorvikische Volkspartei
Status[?]: defeated
Votes: This is an ordinary bill. It requires more yes votes than no votes. This bill will not pass any sooner than the deadline.
Voting deadline: August 3006
Description[?]:
| People should have the right to choose what they wear wherever they wish. |
Proposals
Article 1
Proposal[?] to change The state's policy concerning religious clothing.
Old value:: It is not permitted to wear religious clothing or religious symbols in public buildings.
Current: There are no laws regulating the wearing of religious clothing and the wearing of religious symbols.
Proposed: There are no laws regulating the wearing of religious clothing and the wearing of religious symbols.
Debate
These messages have been posted to debate on this bill:
| Date | 21:25:23, September 26, 2010 CET | From | Dorvikische Volkspartei | To | Debating the Freedom to Wear Religions Clothing Bill |
| Message | OOC: Lol, should be "religious". Apologies. |
| Date | 08:47:15, September 27, 2010 CET | From | National Democrats of Dorvik | To | Debating the Freedom to Wear Religions Clothing Bill |
| Message | Mr SPeakter. Although we bevilive ones religious belivfes its not a issue for the sate, we belive that one should keep these belivfes at home before one goes to work. Our state dose not take stand between religions (or ateism), and one way to show that we are serious in that is all religious symbols are not to wear at all un public bildings. |
subscribe to this discussion - unsubscribe
Voting
| Vote | Seats | |||
| yes | Total Seats: 0 | |||
| no | Total Seats: 333 | |||
| abstain | Total Seats: 42 |
| Random fact: Players who consent to a particular role-play by acknowledging it in their own role-play cannot then disown it or withdraw their consent from it. For example, if player A role-plays the assassination of player B's character, and player B then acknowledges the assassination in a news post, but then backtracks and insists the assassination did not happen, then he will be required under the rules to accept the validity of the assassination role-play. |
| Random quote: "The only people who would be hurt by abandoning the Kyoto Protocol would be several thousand people who make a living attending conferences on global warming." - Kirill Kondratyev |